Comparation of two types of minimal invasive surgery for treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

R 657.4

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with bile duct exploration and stone removal (BDE) and LC with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis.
    Methods :Among 256 cases of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithlasis, 132 patients were treated by LC+LCBDE, and 124 cases by EST combined with LC. The operation success rate, operation time and cost, complication rate, and length of hospital stay of the two groups were compared.
    Results:There was no statistical difference in the operation success rate, complication rate, stone clearance rate, and average hospital stay between the two groups, but EST+LC group had significantly longer operation time and higher cost.
    Conclusions:There are respective indications, advantages and disadvantages in the two groups. EST+LC is the better choice for patients with diameter of CBD<1.0 cm, stones impacted in the distal CBD, or old age. Otherwise, for patients with diameter of CBD>1.0cm and with multiple choledocholithiasis, especially for middle-aged patients, the better way is LC+LCBDE.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

ZHOU Liguo, TANG Caixi, ZHOU Hongbing.Comparation of two types of minimal invasive surgery for treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis[J]. Chin J Gen Surg,2008,17(6):18-598.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2008.06.018

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:January 01,1900
  • Revised:January 01,1900
  • Adopted:
  • Online: June 25,2008
  • Published: