The impact of anatomic and non-anatomic liver resection on early mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

R 735.7

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective:To compare the impact of the type of resection (anatomic versus non-anatomic) on early mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to explore factors related to early mortality in patients after resection of hepatic tumor.
    Methods:Fifty-two patients with similar clinico-pathologic data were randomaly divided into 2 groups for curative liver resection for HCC, 25 patients underwent anatomic resection of at least one liver segment (group A) and 27 patients underwent non-anatomic resection (group B). We compared the age, gender, HbsAg, preoperative serum albumin, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), postoperative pathologic diagnosis, TNM stage, tumor size, portal vein tumor thrombosis, duration of hospital stay and follow-up in the two groups.
    Results:The one year mortality was 20.0% in anatomic resection group and 25.9% in non-anatomic resection group. No significant difference was detected in early mortality and complications between the 2 groups. The blood loss during operation of anatomic resection group was less than that of non-anatomic resection group (P=0.006). Factor contributing to early mortality was presence of portal vein tumor thrombosis (P=0.019).
    Conclusions:There is no significant difference in early mortality between anatomic and non-anatomic liver resection. The presence of portal vein tumor thrombosis could be a major factor to predict early mortality.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

TIAN Yunhong, LI Jingdong, LI Quanlin, LI Dexin, LI Qiang. The impact of anatomic and non-anatomic liver resection on early mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study[J]. Chin J Gen Surg,2011,20(1):23-26.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2011.01.006

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:July 05,2010
  • Revised:November 23,2010
  • Adopted:
  • Online: January 15,2011
  • Published: