Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for recurrent or residual common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

R657.4

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in treatment of recurrent or residual common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy. Methods: The clinical data of 52 patients with recurrent or residual common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy undergoing LCBDE treatment from April 2012 to June 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Of the 52 patients, LCBDE was successfully performed in 48 cases (92.3%), and the remaining 4 cases were converted to open surgery due to severe abdominal adhesion. Of the 48 patients, 15 cases underwent T-tube placement during operation, and 33 cases received primary common bile duct closure; the operative time was (102.6±19.5) min, intraoperative blood loss was (38.6±12.7) mL, and length of postoperative hospital stay was (4.2±2.5) d. Mild bile leakage after operation occurred in 2 cases, and bile peritonitis occurred in one case after T tube removal, which were all resolved by conservative treatment; one case had remnant common bile duct stones after operation, and they were extracted by choledochoscopic net basket via the T-tube sinus tract at 6 weeks after operation. Conclusion: For recurrent or residual common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy, LCBDE has high success rate with minimal invasion and fast recovery, so it is recommended to be used.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

LIU Wensong, SUN Donglin, ZHU Feng, YANG Bo, ZOU Yan. Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for recurrent or residual common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy[J]. Chin J Gen Surg,2016,25(2):209-213.
DOI:10.3978/j. issn.1005-6947.2016.02.009

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:November 02,2015
  • Revised:January 18,2016
  • Adopted:
  • Online: February 15,2016
  • Published: