Analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

R657.5

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective: To identify the factors associated with the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Methods: The clinical data of 100 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy from February 2010 to May 2016 were reviewed. The relevant factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Among the 100 patients, postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 32 cases (32%), with grade A pancreatic fistula (without clinical impact) in 18 cases (18%), and clinically significant pancreatic fistula in 14 cases (14%), compromising grade B pancreatic fistula in 8 cases and grade C pancreatic fistula in 6 cases. In univariate analysis, the high body mass index (≥25 kg/m2) was significantly associated with the occurrence of overall postoperative pancreatic fistula (χ2=4.128, P=0.042), but not with the occurrence of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula (χ2=1.545, P=0.214), while soft pancreatic texture was significantly associated with the occurrence of both overall and clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula (χ2=4.569, P=0.033; χ2=11.374, P=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that soft pancreatic texture was unique independent risk for the occurrence of overall or clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR=2.476, P=0.043; OR=8.012, P=0.003). Conclusion: Pancreatic texture is an important influential factor for the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, and aggressive control measures should be adopted in those with soft pancreatic texture.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

FAN Shengming, SHEN Guoxin, HU Jinling, LIU Junyi. Analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy[J]. Chin J Gen Surg,2017,26(3):289-293.
DOI:10.3978/j. issn.1005-6947.2017.03.004

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:October 27,2016
  • Revised:February 16,2017
  • Adopted:
  • Online: March 15,2017
  • Published: