Abstract:Objective:To study the clinical value of laparoscopic treatment of acute peptic ulcer perforation.
Methods :Laparoscopic treatment group incluing 53 patients with acute peptic ulcer perforation and laparotomic treatment group including 54 cases.The operating time, volume of intra-operative blood loss, time to intestinal function recovery, length of postoperative hospital stay, the use of analgesics, the cost of hospitalization and the postoperative complications between the two groups were compared.
Results:There was a significant difference in the volume of blood loss, the time to intestinal function recovery, the length of postoperative hospital stay, and the use of analgesics between the two groups (all P<0.05).
Conclusions:Compared with laparotomic repair, laparoscopic repair has special advantages in the treatment of acute peptic ulcer perforation, such as less injury, less disturbance of celiac organs, faster recovery and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. This method does not increase the cost of hospitalization and it can replace the traditional laparotomic repair.