Abstract:
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacies of large-lumen catheter thrombus aspiration and thrombolytic treatment for mixed type of acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods: The clinical and follow-up data of 458 patients with acute mixed type of lower extremity DVT admitted over 11 years were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 327 cases (group A) underwent large-lumen catheter thrombus aspiration, and the other 131 cases (group B) received systemic thrombolytic therapy with urokinase. Results: No severe complication occurred in group A during operation, while in group B, life-threatening bleeding occurred in 2 patients during thrombolytic therapy. The average length of hospital stay for patients in group A was 6.5 d and in group B was 9.5 d (P<0.05), and the cure rate in group A and group B was 94.8% and 37.4%, respectively (P<0.05). During 36–48 months follow-up period, the difference between the diameter of the two legs at 15 cm below knee joint was (0.53±0.42) cm in group A and (1.42±1.35) cm in group B (P<0.05); the incidence of edema, skin pigmentation, and ulceration were 27.83%, 13.15% and 0 in group A, and 55.73%, 83.97% and 9.16% in group B, respectively (all P<0.05); the vein patency rate and rate of normal functioning valves were 90.83% and 73.09% in group A, both of which were significantly higher than those in group B (37.41% and15.27%) (both P<0.05); the overall effective rate in group A and group B was 100% and 71.76%, respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion: Large-lumen catheter thrombus aspiration has better efficacy than thrombolytic therapy for acute mixed type of lower extremity DVT, especially in the aspect of venous valves protection.