腹腔镜与传统开腹术治疗直肠癌的手术并发症比较
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

赵平武

基金项目:


Comparison of the complications of treatment of rectal cancer by laparoscopic versus conventional laparotomy procedure
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    分析腹腔镜下全系膜切除术(TME)与开腹TME手术治疗直肠癌在并发症发生率方面的差别。方法:回顾43例腹腔镜和50例传统开腹手术治疗直肠癌患者的临床资料,分析并发症的发生原因及其发生率。结果:腹腔镜治疗组较传统开腹组在术后肠功能恢复、早期下床活动、住院时间等方面均占优势。在术中损伤、吻合口瘘、术后性功能保护、排尿功能障碍、局部复发和切口转移上与传统开腹组均无明显差别。结论:腹腔镜下TME治疗直肠癌的效果同传统开腹术,术后患者自觉症状较开腹手术良好

    Abstract:

    Objective:To compare the postoperative complications rate of total mesorectal excision (TME) performed by laparoscopic and conventional laparotomy method in treatment of rectal cancer.Methods:The clinical data of patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery(n=42) or traditional laparotomy (n=50) were retrospectively analysed to analysis of the cause and occurrence rate of complications. Results:The laparoscopic group had an advantage over the conventional laparotomy group in bowel movement recovery, earlier mobility and short hospital stay time. There was no difference in intraoperative injury, anastomotic leakage, sexual function preservation, longterm urinary dysfunction, and local recurrence or incision metastasis rates. Conclusions:Laparoscopic TME treatment of rectal cancer had the same therapeutic effect as the conventional laparotomy procedure did, and has a better subjective outcome.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵平武,向春华,王东,鲜于剑波,李国强,许治华.腹腔镜与传统开腹术治疗直肠癌的手术并发症比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2005,14(12):2-895.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2005.12.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2005-12-25