联合介入栓塞治疗门静脉高压症的临床研究
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

李恩山

基金项目:


Clinical study of combined interventional embolization for the treatment of portal hypertention
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    摘要:目的:探讨经皮经肝食管胃底静脉栓塞术(PTVE)联合部分脾脏栓塞术(PSE)治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症的临床效果。
    方法:采用经皮经肝TH胶定位栓塞胃冠状静脉(必要时联合栓塞胃短和胃后静脉)联合脾部分栓塞术,治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症并上消化道出血患者66例,以54例采用断流加脾次全切除腹膜后移位术的患者为对照,进行对比研究。随访2~60个月,平均20个月。
    结果:(1)研究组急诊止血率100%,再出血率3.3%;对照组急诊止血率100%,再出出血率4.8%。两组比较均无显著性差异(均P>0.05)。(2)门静脉高压性胃病(PHG): 研究组栓塞后2个月和1年与栓塞前相比,无明显变化(P>0.05);对照组术后2个月比术前加重(P<0.05),术后1年比术前减轻(P<0.05);研究组与对照组相比,PHG的变化无显著性差异(P>0. 05)。(3)术后1年食管胃底静脉曲张:研究组54中好转59.3%(32/54),消失20.4%(11/54),无变化18.5%(10/54),加重1.8%(1/54);对照组中,好转52%(26/50),消失20%(10/50),无变化28%(14/50),两组疗效相似(P>0.05)。(4)自由门静脉压力(FPP):两组治疗结束时均较术前明显下降(P<0.05),研究组平均减少(2.55±6.93)cmH2O,对照组平均减少(2.46±7.07)cmH2O两组间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。
    结论:联合介入栓塞术止血确切,降低门脉压力显著,再出血率低,能够消除脾亢,保留脾功能,达到与断流加脾次全切除腹膜后移位术相似的疗效;且创伤小,适应证宽。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective:To study the effect of combination of esophageal varices and spleen interventional embolization for portal hypertention with gastroesophageal variceal bleeding.
    Methods :A comparative study was done as follows: In treatment group, percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolization with TH glue combined with partial splenic embolization was performed in 66 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension; in control group, 54 patients were treated by devasculization and subtotal splenectomy with retroperitoneal splenic transposition . The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 60 months ( averages 20 months).
    Results:(1)In treatment group ,the rates of emergency control of hemorrhage and rebleeding was 100% and 3.3% respectively. In the control guoup, the rate of rebleeding was 4.8%.(2) In the treatment group, at 2 months and 1 year postoperation, PHG was unchanged compared with that of preoperation. In the control group, at 2 months postoperation, PHG was significantly aggravated compared with that of preoperation(P<0.05), but at 1 year postoperation, PHG was significantly improved compared with that of preoperation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in change of PHG (P>0.05). (3) In the treatment group, the rate of disappearance, improvement, absence and aggravation change of G-E varices was 20.4%, 59.3%, 18.3%, and 1.8% , respectively, and in the control group, the varices disappearance rate was 20%, improvement rate 52%, and absence rate 28%. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). (4) Free pressure of portal vein (FPP) significantly declined at post-operation in the two groups (P<0.05). In the treatment group, average decline of FPP was (2.55±6.93) cmH2O, and in the control group it was (2.46±7.07) cmH2O.
    Conclusions:Combined interventional embolization has the advantages of controlling variceal hemorrage and decreasing portal venous pressure, and does not aggravate PHG. The result shows that this method possessed an effect similar to that of subtotal splenectomy with retroperitonal splenic transposition and devascularization.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘学键, 李恩山, 马幼平, 张春清.联合介入栓塞治疗门静脉高压症的临床研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2008,17(1):20-74.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2008.01.015

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2008-01-25