重症急性胰腺炎早期微创手术与传统常规治疗效果的荟萃分析
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

蔡清萍

基金项目:


A meta-analysis of early minimally invasive surgical treatment versus conventional treatment in patients with severe acute pancreatitis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    目的:通过荟萃分析比较微创手术与传统常规治疗对早期重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)的治疗效果。
    方法:根据纳入标准,摘录8篇RCT文献中有关试验设计、研究对象的特征、研究结果等内容,用RevMan4.2软件进行分析。
    结果:SAP早期微创手术治疗较之传统常规治疗效果差异显著;前者病死率(RR=0.35,95%CI: 0.20~0.63,P<0.01)及并发症发生率(RR=0.46,95%CI:0.33~0.63,P<0.01)低于后者,住院时间减少(WMD=-22.47,95%CI: -35.41~-9.53, P<0.001),治愈率(RR=1.24,95%CI: 1.13~1.36, P<0.01)高于后者。
    结论:SAP早期应在传统常规治疗的同时选用微创手术治疗。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective:To analyze and compare the effect of early minimally invasive surgical treatment and conventional treatment for patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
    Methods :According to the including criteria, eight randomized-controlled trials of this topic were enrolled into the analysis. The detail about the trial design, characters of the subjects and results of the studies were reviewed and analyzed by using Revman 4.2 software.
    Results:Compared with conventional treatment, early minimally invasive surgical treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of mortality(RR=0.35,95%CI:0.20~0.63,P<0.01), complications (RR=0.46, 95%CI:0.33~0.63,P<0.01) and hospital stay duration (WMD=-22.47,95%CI:-35.41 ~ -9.53, P<0.001), and with a higher cure rate (RR=1.24,95%CI:1.13~1.36,P<0.01).
    Conclusions:The findings suggest that for early severe acute pancreatitis, minimally invasive surgical treatment, should be selected as the first choice of treatment, while conventional treatment was used.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张阳,蔡清萍.重症急性胰腺炎早期微创手术与传统常规治疗效果的荟萃分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2008,17(9):1-843.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2008.09.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2008-09-25