腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆总管结石的临床分析
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

陈武强Email:chengua007@yahoo.com.cn

基金项目:


Clinical analysis of the treatment of choledocholithiasis by laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    目的:评价腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆总管结石的临床效果。
    方法:对比分析腹腔镜联合胆道镜手术组(n=50)与开腹手术组(n=50)胆总管探查取石术的手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气恢复时间、术后住院天数、术后疼痛率、并发症发生率等指标。
    结果:腹腔镜联合胆道镜手术组的手术操作时间长于开腹手术组(P<0.01);术中出血量、术后排气恢复时间、术后住院天数、术后疼痛率、切口感染率均明显低于开腹手术组(P<0.01);术后胆瘘、结石残余率两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    结论:腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆总管结石安全可靠,手术创伤小,术后恢复快,值得临床推广。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of choledocholithiasis treated by laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy.
     Methods: The operative time, blood loss, time to passage of flatus, hospital stay, and rates of postoperative pain and complications were compared between the laparoscopic surgery group (n=50) and open surgery group (n=50).
     Results: In laparoscopic surgery group, the operative time was longer than that in open surgery group(P<0.01), whereas the blood loss, time to passage of flatus, hospital stay, rates of postoperative pain and wound infection were obviously lower than those in open surgery group(P<0.01). There was no significant difference of the rates of bile leakage and residual stone between the two groups(P>0.05).
     Conclusions: The combined application of laparoscopy and choledochoscopy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis is safe and effective, and with the advantage of less trauma and quick recovery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈武强|王京立|杨敖霖|俞宪民|李建平|顾元龙.腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆总管结石的临床分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2010,19(2):120-123.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2010.02.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2009-08-25
  • 最后修改日期:2010-01-05
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2010-02-15