意外胆囊癌临床分析:附37例报告
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

李宜雄 E-mail:liyixiong6@hotmail.com

基金项目:


A clinical analysis of unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma: a report of 37 cases
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    目的:探讨意外胆囊癌的临床病理特点、外科治疗及预后。
    方法:回顾性分析37例意外胆囊癌(IGC组)的临床资料,并与同期收治的89例其他胆囊癌(GC组)进行对比。
    结果:与GC组相似,IGC组主要表现为右上腹痛(94.6% vs.93.3%),部分合并黄疸(16.2% vs.31.5%);IGC组与GC组在年龄[(56±12)岁 vs.(57±9)岁],女性患者比例(78.4% vs.62.9%),CEA(25% vs.32.8%),CA19-9(30.0% vs.68.3%)阳性率,肿瘤分布部位,病理类型和分级,术后并发症发生率(2.7% vs.6.7%)均无统计学差异(均P>0.05),但其合并胆囊结石率(86.5% vs.50.6%)和早期(ⅠA期)病例比例(29.7% vs.9.0%)及手术切除率(56.8% vs.32.6%)均明显高于GC组(均P<0.05),晚期(Ⅲ,Ⅳ期)比例明显低于GC组(43.2% vs.74.2%,P=0.001)。IGC组的总体1,3,5年生存率(70.0%,31.2%,26.8%)及平均生存期和中位生存期[(51±13)个月,17个月]明显高于GC组(27.0%,17.7%,15.1%)[(25±8)个月,5个月](均P<0.01)。单因素生存分析结果显示TNM分期(P=0.000),T分期(P=0.000),手术方式(P=0.008)是显著影响IGC的预后因素,但是病理分级(P=0.080),年龄(P=0.188),性别(P=0.234)对预后无显著影响。COX多因素分析结果显示T分期(P=0.000)是影响IGC预后的独立因子。
    结论:与GC相比,IGC合并胆囊结石率高,早期病例及切除率相对高,预后相对好; T分期是IGC的最显著的预后因子;除原位癌(Tis)及癌仅侵及黏膜层(T1a期)外,其他分期肿瘤,如首次手术漏诊,一律应尽早进行再次手术行根治性切除。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological features, surgical treatment and prognosis of incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGC).
    Methods: The clinical data of 37 IGC cases admitted to our hospital were retrospectively analysed, and the data were compared with other gallbalder carcinoma cases (GC group) admited over the same period of time.
    Results: In both IGC and GC groups, the main symptom was abdominal pain located in the upper right quadrant (94.6% vs. 93.3%) and some patients had jaundice (16.2% vs. 31.5%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in several aspects, such as age (56±12 vs. 57±9), proportion of female patients(78.4% vs. 62.9%), positive  ratio  of CEA (25% vs. 32.8%)and CA19-9(30% vs. 68.3%),tumor location,  pathological type, pathological grade, and postoperative complication rate (2.7% vs. 6.7%)(All P>0.05). However,  the percentage of patients with cholecystolithiassis was 86.5% in IGC group, and 50.6% in GC group (P=0.000). Besides the percentage of IA stage in IGC  group (29.7%) was relatively higher than that (9.0%)in GC group (P=0.03); the surgical resection rate of tumor in IGC group was 56.8% and 32.6% in GC group (P=0.01). Nevertheless, the percentage of advance stage in IGC group (43.2%) was relatively lower than that in GC group (74.2%) (P=0.001). The overall 1, 3, and 5-year survival rate of IGC group was 70.0%, 31.2% and 26.8% repectively, and the mean survival time was17 months (51±13); which were significantly higher than those in GC group, in  which the 1, 3, 5-year survival rate was 27.0%, 17.7% and 15.1%  repectively and the mean survival time was (25±8),5 months (all P=0.006). Single factor analysis showed that the survival time in IGC patients was influenced by the TNM stage(P=0.000), pT-category (P=0.000), operation-category(P=0.008); however, postoperative pathological grade(P=0.080), age (P=0.188) and sex(P=0.234) had no influence on survival rate. According to multivariate analysis, pT-category(P=0.000)was an independent factor for the survival time of IGC.
    Conclusions: Comparing with GC group, IGC has a higher percentage of cholecystolithiassis, IA tumor stage and surgical resection rate, and thus, it has relatively better progonosis. pT-category is the vital independent prognostic factor in IGC. If a patient in ICG has been misdiagnosed during the primary operation, the patient should be re-operated for radical excision as soon as possible, except when the tumor is in stage Tis or T1a.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

易小平| 李宜雄| 吕新生| 宰红艳| 欧阳洋.意外胆囊癌临床分析:附37例报告[J].中国普通外科杂志,2010,19(8):889-895.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2010.08.014

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-02-26
  • 最后修改日期:2010-06-28
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2010-08-15