实用封闭式负压引流治疗难愈性创面的疗效观察
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

王维平E-mail:emailwangkeke@163.com

基金项目:


Closed negative pressure drainage in treatment of recalcitrant wounds
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    目的:观察实用封闭式负压引流治疗难愈性创面的临床效果。
    方法:将78例慢性创面患者随机分为2组,治疗组38例,采用实用封闭式负压引流治疗;对照组40例,采用普通换药治疗。比较2组创面进入红期所需时间、治疗1周时的创面愈合率及创面愈合时间。
    结果:治疗组治疗1周时的创面愈合率高于对照组(P<0.05),治疗组创面进入红期所需时间、创面愈合时间均较对照组缩短(均P<0.05)。
    结论:实用封闭式负压引流治疗难愈性创面效果优于普通换药,可促进创面愈合,使用方便,值得推广。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To observe the clinical effect of closed negative pressure drainage on refractory wounds.
    Methods:Seventy-eight patients with refractory wound were randomly divided into 2 groups; The treatment group (38 patients) was treated with closed negative pressure drainage ;the control group (40 patients) was treated by conventioal methods.The time for wound surface to enter into the red stage, the 1-week wound healing rate, and the overall healing time between the 2 groups were compared.
    Results:Treatment group was significantly better than control group in the time for wound surface to enter into the red stage, the 1-week wound healing rate,and the overall healing time (all, P<0.05).
    Conclusions: The closed negative pressure drainage therapy is better than conventional treatment for refractory wound because it can promote wound healing and its use is convenient, and thus it is advocated for widespread use.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王维平| 王科科| 李强| 刘江辉| 黄勇| 姬忠良.实用封闭式负压引流治疗难愈性创面的疗效观察[J].中国普通外科杂志,2010,19(9):1019-1021.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2010.09.017

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-06
  • 最后修改日期:2010-06-21
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2010-09-15