多种肿瘤标志物联合检测对肝门胆管癌诊断的意义
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

曹景玉, Email: cjy7027@163.com

基金项目:


Diagnostic value of combination detection of multiple tumor markers for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    目的:探讨联合检测肿瘤标志物CA50,CA125,CA242,CA19-9 及CEA 对肝门胆管癌诊断的意义。 方法:选择近2 年间住院且术后病理证实为肝门胆管癌患者90 例作为观察组,同期胆道良性病变 患者91 例作为对照组,采用全自动电化学发光分析仪测定两组患者术前血清中CA50,CA125, CA242,CA19-9 及CEA 的水平。分别计算两组血清中5 种肿瘤标志物的敏感性、特异性及准确性。 结果: 观察组血清CA50,CA242,CA19-9 及CEA 的水平明显高于对照组( 均P<0.01), 而观 察组血清CA125 水平与对照组血清CA125 水平比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。血清CAl9-9 在肝 门胆管癌中阳性率最高(86.67%),次为CA242(63.33%)及CA50(60%);两组患者血清中 5 种标志物的阳性率比较,除CA125 外,各相应组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对于肝门 胆管癌的诊断,血清CA19-9 灵敏度最好(93.98%),而CEA 的特异度最好(94.60%)。 结论:联合检测CA50,CA242,CA19-9 和CEA 有助于肝门胆管癌与胆道良性疾病鉴别。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of the combination detection of the tumor markers, CA50, CA125, CA242, CA19-9 and CEA for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods: Ninety patients admitted to our hospital in the recent two years, who were confirmed having hilar cholangiocarcinoma by postoperative pathology, were included in the observation group, and another group of 91 patients with benign biliary tract diseases hospitalized during the same period served as control group. The serum levels of CA50, CA125, CA242, CA19-9 and CEA of the two groups were detected by automatic electrochemiluminescence analyzer, and the sensitivities, specificities and accuracies of the five tumor markers of the two groups were determined, respectively. Results: The serum levels of CA50, CA242, CA19-9 and CEA in the observation group were all significantly higher than those of the control group, (all P<0.01), but the difference of the serum levels of CA125 between the two groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05). In hilar cholangiocarcinoma, the serum CA19-9 showed the highest positive rate (86.67%) among the five markers, followed by CA242 (63.33%), and CA50 (60%), successively. Between the two groups, the positive rates of the five tumor markers, except for CA125, had significant differences (all P<0.05). For the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, serum CA19-9 had the best sensitivity (93.98%), while CEA had the best specificity (94.60%). Conclusion: Combination detection of CA50, CA242, CA19-9 and CEA is helpful for differential diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and benign biliary tract diseases.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙文德|曹景玉|王云玲|叶荣|韩瑞|范友杰.多种肿瘤标志物联合检测对肝门胆管癌诊断的意义[J].中国普通外科杂志,2012,21(2):140-143.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2012.02.004

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2011-11-15
  • 最后修改日期:2012-01-10
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2012-02-15