肝癌合并门静脉癌栓患者术后肝动脉化疗栓塞术联合门静脉化疗的有效性及安全性
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

杜锡林 , Email: dxlin0705@163.com

基金项目:


Efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus portal vein chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients associated with portal vein tumor thrombus
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    目的:探讨肝癌合并门静脉癌栓(PVTT)患者术后辅助肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合门静脉化疗(PVC)的有效性及安全性。
    方法:回顾性分析2010年1月—2016年1月收治的经手术治疗的119例肝癌合并PVTT患者临床资料,其中64例术中放置门静脉化疗泵,术后行TACE治疗及通过门静脉化疗泵行PVC(TACE+PVC组),55例术中未放置门静脉化疗泵,术后行单纯TACE(TACE组)。观察两组术后生存及并发症情况。
    结果:TACE+PVC组与TACE组中位无瘤生存期及中位生存期分别为13.3个月vs. 6.8个月、19.5个月vs. 12.5个月;术后0.5、1、2、3年的无瘤生存率及71.9% vs. 52.9%、57.5% vs. 26.7%、16.4% vs. 8.2%、6.9% vs. 2.1%,总生存率分别为90.5% vs. 89.1%、69.5% vs. 50.4%、37.9% vs. 12.1%、22.4% vs. 8.1%, TACE+PVC组的无瘤生存率与总生存率均明显优于TACE组(P=0.004、P=0.001)。统计分析显示,术后治疗方式是患者术后生存时间的独立影响因素之一(P<0.05)。两组术后各并发症发生率差异无统计科学意义(均P>0.05)。
    结论:术后辅助TACE联合PVC治疗合并PVTT的肝癌患者安全有效,且效果优于单纯TACE治疗。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus portal vein chemotherapy (PVC) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).  
    Methods: The clinical data of 119 HCC patients associated with PVTT undergoing surgical treatment from January 2010 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 64 cases underwent placement of an intravenous chemotherapy pump during operation, and then underwent TACE and PVC through the intravenous chemotherapy pump after operation (TACE+PVC group), and 55 cases did not undergo intravenous chemotherapy pump placement and underwent TACE along after operation (TACE group). The postoperative survival and incidence of postoperative complications of the two groups of patients were observed.
    Results: In TACE+PVC group and TACE group, the median disease-free survival (DFS) time and median overall survival (OS) time were 13.3 months vs.6.8 months, and 19.5 months vs.12.5 months, and the 0.5-, 1, 2, and 3-year DFS rates were 71.9% vs.52.9%, 57.5% vs. 26.7%, 16.4% vs.8.2% and 6.9% vs. 2.1%, and OS rates were 90.5% vs. 89.1%, 69.5% vs. 50.4%, 37.9% vs. 12.1% and 22.4% vs. 8.1%, respectively. The median tumor-free survival and median survival time in the TACE group were 6.8 months and 12.5 months, respectively. Both DFS rate and OS rate of TACE+PVC group were significantly higher than those of TACE group (P=0.004 and P=0.001). Results of statistical analysis showed that postoperative treatment method was one of the independent risk factors for postoperative survival of the patients (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in incidence of each specific postoperative complication between the two groups (all P>0.05). 
    Conclusion: Postoperative adjuvant TACE plus PVC is safe and effective for patients with HCC and PVTT, and its efficacy is superior to that of TACE alone.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

代柏树, 雷世雄, 杨振宇, 杜锡林.肝癌合并门静脉癌栓患者术后肝动脉化疗栓塞术联合门静脉化疗的有效性及安全性[J].中国普通外科杂志,2019,28(2):188-194.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2019.02.009

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-21
  • 最后修改日期:2019-01-11
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-02-25