阿帕替尼联合经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗中晚期肝癌疗效及安全性的Meta分析
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

唐才喜, Email: tcx0826@163.com

基金项目:

湖南省科技厅科技计划资助项目(2016SK4006);湖南省卫计委医药卫生科研计划资助项目(C2016109)。


Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for intermediate and advanced liver cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    目的:评价阿帕替尼联合经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗中晚期肝癌的疗效及安全性。
    方法:计算机搜索多个国内外数据库中公开发表的比较阿帕替尼联合TACE(试验组)与单独TACE(对照组)治疗中晚期肝癌的随机对照研究,检索时间从各数据库建库至2019年3月。提取文献资料并采用Cochrane风险评价表评价纳入文献质量,用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。
    结果:最终纳入8篇文献随机对照研究,共486例患者,试验组与对照组各243例。与对照组比较,试验组近期疗效(客观缓解率:OR=2.88,95% CI=1.80~4.62,P<0.000 1;疾病控制率:OR=3.29,95% CI=1.96~5.53,P<0.000 01)与远期疗效(6个月生存率:OR=2.89,95% CI=1.74~4.80,P<0.000 1;12个月生存率:OR=2.37,95% CI=1.46~3.83,P=0.000 5;24个月生存率:OR=2.67,95% CI=1.41~5.04,P=0.002)均明显改善。试验组手足综合征和蛋白尿发生率较对照组明显升高(均P<0.05),而其他不良反应如发热、恶心呕吐、腹泻、骨髓抑制、高血压等与对照组无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。
    结论:阿帕替尼联合TACE治疗中晚期肝癌的近远期疗效均优于单独TACE治疗,但相关的副反应可能影响适用范围和患者生活质量。 

    Abstract:

    Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treatment of intermediate and advanced liver cancer.    
    Methods: The publicly published randomized controlled studies comparing apatinib plus TACE (study group) and TACE alone (control group) for intermediate and advanced liver cancer were searched on computer in several national and international databases. The search was restricted from inception of each respective database to March 2019. The quality assessment was carried out using the Cochrane risk of bias tool after data extraction, and Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. 
    Results: Eight randomized controlled studies were finally included, involving a total of 486 patients, with 243 cases each in study group and control group. In study group compared with control group, both short-term efficacy (objective remission rate: OR=2.88, 95% CI=1.80–4.62, P<0.000 1; disease control rate: OR=3.29, 95% CI=1.96–5.53, P<0.000 01) and long-term results (6-month survival rate: OR=2.89, 95% CI=1.74–4.80, P<0.000 1; 12-month survival rate: OR=2.37, 95% CI=1.46–3.83, P=0.000 5; 24-month survival rate: OR=2.67, 95% CI=1.41–5.04, P=0.002) were significantly improved. The incidence of hand-foot syndrome and albuminuria were significantly higher in study group compared to control group (both P<0.05), while other adverse reactions such as fever, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, myelosuppression and hypertension showed no significant differences between the two groups (all P>0.05).
    Conclusion: Both short-term efficacy and long-term results of apatinib combined with TACE are superior to those of TACE alone in treatment of intermediate and advanced liver cancer. The overall survival time of apatinib group is longer, and can improve the short-term efficacy and long-term survival rate of patients, but the related side effects are common. However, the associated adverse effects may probably affect its application range and the patients’ quality of life.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱泽民, 谢智钦, 赵志坚, 刘智勇, 易波, 唐才喜.阿帕替尼联合经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗中晚期肝癌疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2019,28(7):798-808.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2019.07.005

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-11
  • 最后修改日期:2019-06-19
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-07-25