脾动脉瘤的临床特征与腔内治疗:附30例报告
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

王伟, Email: wangweicsu@126.com

基金项目:


Clinical characteristics and endovascular treatment of splenic artery aneurysm: a report of 30 cases
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的:脾动脉瘤(SAA)是一类少见、具有潜在致命破裂风险的内脏动脉瘤疾病。SAA的传统手术方式为开腹切除动脉瘤及脾脏。近年来,随着介入技术和材料的发展,SAA的腔内治疗越来越普及。相比于开放手术,腔内治疗具有微创、简便、术后快速康复的优势。本文探讨SAA腔内治疗的有效性和安全性。
    方法:回顾性分析2012年1月—2019年12月在中南大学湘雅医院血管外科治疗的30例SAA患者资料,并介绍了我科治疗SAA的3种介入手术方式。
    结果:患者30例均行腹部CTA明确SAA诊断,其中近脾门型17例,中间型9例,远脾门型4例;囊状动脉瘤19例,梭形动脉瘤11例。30例均采取腔内治疗方法,其中21例行SAA栓塞术,6例行脾动脉支架置入术,3例行脾动脉裸支架置入+栓塞术。患者术后平均住院时间4 d,平均住院费用5万元,术后发生腹痛、呕吐、发热等症状10例,症状均在3 d以内缓解,无后遗症发生。发生穿刺点出血1例,保守治疗好转后出院。住院期间无急性脾梗死发生,没有发生需再次手术的并发症。22例患者术后随访3~6个月,CT复查示动脉瘤完全血栓化,未见造影剂进入;出现无症状局灶性脾梗死5例。
    结论:介入腔内手术可在保留脾脏的情况下治疗SAA,治疗效果确切,且创伤小,术后恢复快,并发症发生概率低,住院时间短,费用相比开放手术无明显增加。腔内治疗可作为绝大部分SAA的首选治疗,具体手术方式需根据术前CTA显示的SAA形态及位置来决定。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims: Splenic artery aneurysms (SAA) are a type of visceral aneurysmal disease, which are uncommon but potentially fatal if rupture occurs. The traditional treatment for SAA is open aneurysmectomy with splenectomy. In recent years, endovascular operation for SAA become increasingly popular with the development of interventional techniques and materials. Endovascular treatment has the advantages of minimal invasion, simple operation and fast postoperative recovery. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment of SAA. 
    Methods: The clinical data of 30 patients with SAA treated in the Department of Vascular Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University during Janurary 2012 to December 2019 were reviewed, and three interventional methods used for the treatment of SAA in our department were also introduced.
    Results: Definitive diagnosis of SAA was made by abdominal CTA in all the 30 patients. The lesions were located in the proximal splenic artery in17 cases, in the middle segment of the splenic artery in 9 cases, and in the distal splenic artery in 4 cases; 19 lesions were fusiform and 11 lesions were saccular. All patients received endovascular repair, of whom, 21 cases underwent SAA embolization, 6 cases underwent splenic artery stenting, and 3 cases  received splenic artery bare stent placement plus embolization. The average length of hospital stay was 4 d, and average medical expense was 50 000 yuan. The symptoms such as abdominal pain, vomit and fever occurred in 10 patients after operation, and were alleviated within 3 d without any sequelae. One patient had puncture site bleeding and was recovered and discharged after conservative treatment. No acute splenic infarction and complications requiring re-operation occurred during hospitalization. Postoperative follow-up was conducted in 22 patients, and the CTA showed that the aneurysms were occluded completely by thrombosis without endoleak of contrast agent, and asymptomatic focal splenic infarction was found in 5 patients.
    Conclusion: Interventional endovascular treatment can cure the SAA with preservation of the spleen. It has demonstrable efficacy with minimal invasiveness and quick recovery, low incidence of complications, and short length of hospitalization, and without increase in cost compared to open surgery. Endovascular therapy can be considered as the first choice for majority of SAA, and the specific procedure selection should be based on the morphology and position of the SAA shown by CTA.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

乐天鸣, 王宪伟, 王伟.脾动脉瘤的临床特征与腔内治疗:附30例报告[J].中国普通外科杂志,2020,29(6):706-714.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2020.06.011

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-16
  • 最后修改日期:2020-05-25
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-06-25