三阴性乳腺癌患者辅助化疗后不同骨髓抑制程度对预后的影响
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

张彦武, Email: zyw555@126.com

基金项目:

河南省医学科技攻关计划资助项目(2018020209)。


Influence of degrees of myelosuppression following adjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis of patients with triple-negative breast cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的:三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)是预后较差的乳腺癌亚型,因缺乏内分泌治疗和抗HER-2治疗的靶点,辅助化疗是其主要的治疗策略。骨髓抑制作为化疗最常见的毒副反应之一,对TNBC的预后有何影响目前尚不明确,本研究旨在探讨TNBC辅助化疗后骨髓抑制程度对预后的影响。
    方法:根据入组及排除标准,收集2012年1月—2017年12月在郑州大学第三附属医院乳腺科行表柔比星联合环磷酰胺序贯多西他赛(EC-T)方案辅助化疗的TNBC患者的临床、病理及随访资料并进行回顾性研究。按照WHO抗癌药物急性及亚急性毒性反应分度标准将入组患者根据化疗后骨髓抑制程度分为轻度组(0~II度)和重度组(III~IV度)。比较两组患者的临床病理特征、无疾病生存率(DFS)、无局部-区域复发生存率(LRFS)、无远处复发生存率(DRFS)和总生存率(OS)的差异。
    结果:本研究共纳入168例患者,其中轻度组纳入102例,重度组纳入66例,两组患者的基线临床病理特征差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。轻度组的中位随访时间是66.5(22~95)个月,重度组的中位随访时间是67.5(28~96)个月。轻度组、重度组分别发生DFS事件38例和15例,轻度组的中位DFS为84个月,重度组未达到中位DFS;轻度组、重度组分别发生OS事件20例和8例,两组均未达到中位OS;轻度组、重度组分别发生LRFS事件17例和8例,两组均未达到中位LRFS;轻度组、重度组分别发生DRFS事件27例和10例,两组均未达到中位DRFS。生存分析显示,重度组的5年DFS率高于轻度组(78.3% vs. 69.2%,HR=0.45,P=0.037);重度组与轻度组的5年OS率差异无统计学意义(91.1% vs. 83.3%,HR=0.602,P=0.183);重度组与轻度组的5年LRFS率差异无统计学意义(89.1% vs. 83.3%,HR=0.625,P=0.270);重度组的5年DRFS率高于轻度组(85.5% vs. 77.0%,HR=0.41,P=0.048)。
    结论: TNBC患者EC-T方案辅助化疗期间出现III~IV度骨髓抑制者较0~II度骨髓抑制者预后好,提示化疗诱导的骨髓抑制可以作为化疗有效性的标志,有助于判断预后和制定治疗决策。对于仅轻度骨髓抑制的患者,可能后续需要强化治疗。值得注意的是,重度骨髓抑制会增加粒细胞减少性发热及感染的风险,必须权衡利弊、严密监控并进行对症治疗。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with poor prognosis. Due to the lack of endocrine therapy and anti-HER-2 therapy targets, adjuvant chemotherapy is its main treatment strategy. As one of the most common side effects of chemotherapy, bone marrow suppression has an unclear effect on the prognosis of TNBC. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of the degree of bone marrow suppression on the prognosis of TNBC after adjuvant chemotherapy. 
    Methods: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the clinical, pathological and follow-up data of patients with TNBC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (EC-T) regimen in the Department of Breast of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2012 to December 2017 collected for a retrospective analysis. Based on the WHO classification criteria for acute and subacute toxicity of anticancer drugs, the enrolled patients were divided into mild group (degree 0–II) and severe group (degree III–IV) according to the degree of bone marrow suppression after chemotherapy. The clinicopathologic features, disease-free survival (DFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and total survival (OS) were compared between the two groups of patients.
    Results: A total of 168 patients were included with 102 cases in mild group and 66 cases in severe group. There were no statistical differences in the baseline clinicopathologic characteristics between the two groups of patients (all P>0.05). The median follow-up time for mild group was 66.5 (22-95) months, and for severe group was 67.5 (28-96) months. There were 38 and 15 DFS events in mild group and severe group respectively, and the median DFS in mild group was 84 months, while severe group did not reach a median DFS; 20 and 8 OS events occurred in mild group and severe group respectively, and neither group achieved a median OS; 17 and 8 LRFS events were recorded in mild group and severe group respectively, and neither group reached a median LRFS; there were 27 and 10 DRFS events in mild group and severe group respectively, and neither group reached a median DRFS. Survival analysis showed that the 5-year DFS rate of severe group was higher than that of mild group (78.3% vs. 69.2%, HR=0.45, P=0.037); there was no significant difference in the 5-year OS rate between severe group and mild group (91.1% vs. 83.3%, HR=0.602, P=0.183; no statistical difference in the 5-year LRFS rate between severe group and mild group (89.1% vs. 83.3%, HR=0.625, P=0.270); the 5-year DRFS rate of severe group was higher than that of mild group (85.5% vs. 77.0%, HR=0.41, P=0.048).
    Conclusion: TNBC patients with grade III–IV myelosuppression during adjuvant chemotherapy with EC-T regimen have a better prognosis than those with grade 0–II myelosuppression, suggesting that chemotherapy-induced hematological toxicity can be regarded as a sign of the effectiveness of chemotherapy, and is helpful for prognosis estimation and treatment decision making. For patients with only mild bone marrow suppression, following more intense treatment may be required. The issue that needs attention is that severe myelosuppression will increase the risk of neutropenic fever and infection, so the pros and cons must be weighed, and strict monitoring as well as symptomatic treatment must be offered. 

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张彦武, 李帅萍, 牛耀东, 王璐, 展翔宇.三阴性乳腺癌患者辅助化疗后不同骨髓抑制程度对预后的影响[J].中国普通外科杂志,2020,29(11):1319-1326.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2020.11.005

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-14
  • 最后修改日期:2020-08-14
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-11-25