预防性补片置入在预防造口旁疝中应用价值的Meta分析
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

基金项目:


Meta-analysis of application value of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of parastomal hernia 
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的:造口旁疝(PSH)是造口术后常见并发症,存在发生率高及修复困难等特点。为此,有研究提出在造口术时应用预防性补片加强腹壁的方法来减少这一并发症。然而,最近的几项研究对预防性补片效果提出了挑战。本研究通过Meta分析的方法系统评价应用预防性补片对预防造口术后PSH形成的有效性及安全性。
    方法:检索多个国内外数据库收集应用补片在预防PSH的临床随机对照研究(RCT),检索时间为建库至2020年3月。按照制定的纳入排除标准由2名研究者独立筛选、提取数据并进行质量评价后,采用Revaman 5.3软件进行Meta分析并评估偏倚风险。
    结果:最终纳入12项中等及以上质量RCT,共计963例患者,其中479例接受预防性补片置入(补片组),484例未置补片(对照组)。Meta分析结果示,在预防PSH发生方面,补片组优于对照组(RR=0.44,95% CI=0.29~0.65,P<000 1);在造口相关并发症方面,补片组与对照组在造口相关性感染(RR=0.92,95% CI=0.46~1.81,P=0.80)、造口脱垂(RR=0.29,95% CI=0.08~1.07,P=0.06)、造口坏死(RR=0.72,95% CI=0.32~1.61,P=0.42)、造口狭窄(RR=2.31,95% CI=0.79~6.81,P=0.13)及造口需重新修复(RR=0.88,95% CI=0.48~1.61,P=0.68)等发生率差异均无统计学意义。亚组分析示,手术方式、诊断方式、补片位置、随访时间均非研究间异质性的主要来源(均P>0.05)。
    结论:现有研究表明常规造口时应用预防性补片可显著降低PSH的发生率,且不会增加与造口相关的并发症,具有临床推广价值,但结果还需多中心、大样本高质量的RCT进一步验证。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a common complication after ostomy surgery, which has a high incidence rate and is difficult to repair. Therefore, some studies suggested using prophylactic mesh to strengthen abdominal wall to prevent this complication. However, the effectiveness of prophylactic mesh has been challenged by several recent studies. This study was conducted to systematically evaluate the efficacy of using prophylactic mesh in preventing PSH after ostomy surgery and its safety. 
    Methods: The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning using prophylactic mesh for prevention of PSH were collected by searching several national and international databases. The retrieval time was from the inception to March 2020. After literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment by two independent researchers according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria, Meta-analysis with bias risk assessment was performed using Revaman 5.3 software.
    Results: A total of 12 RCTs with a medium or high quality were included, involving 963 patients, of whom 479 cases received prophylactic mesh placement (mesh group) and 484 cases did not receive mesh placement (control group). Results of Meta-analysis showed that mesh group was superior to control group in the prevention of PSH (RR=0.44, 95% CI=0.29–0.65, P<000 1), and as for the colostomy complications, there were no statistical differences between mesh group and control group in the incidence of stoma-related infection (RR=0.92, 95% CI= 0.46–1.81, P=0.80), stoma prolapse (RR=0.29, 95% CI=0.08–1.07, P=0.06), stoma necrosis (RR=0.72, 95% CI=0.32–1.61, P=0.42) stoma stenosis (RR=2.31, 95% CI=0.79–6.81, P=0.13) and stoma requiring repair (RR=0.88, 95% CI=0.48–1.61, P=0.68). Subgroup analysis showed that the surgical type, diagnostic method, mesh position and follow-up time were all not determinants of the heterogeneity across studies (all P>0.05).
    Conclusion: The existing studies indicate that using prophylactic mesh during routine ostomy surgery can effectively reduce the incidence of PSH, without increasing the stoma-related complications. However, this conclusion still needs multicenter high-quality RCTs with a large-sample size to further confirm.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

许彬彬,周林秋,段建春,陈志红,傅宇,徐群.预防性补片置入在预防造口旁疝中应用价值的Meta分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2021,30(4):386-398.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2021.04.003

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-09
  • 最后修改日期:2021-04-25
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-09-03