Glisson蒂鞘外与鞘内法在腹腔镜解剖性右肝后叶切除的对比研究
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

1.湖南省人民医院/湖南师范大学附属第一医院 肝胆外科,湖南 长沙 410005;2.湖南省邵阳市中心医院 肝胆外科,湖南 邵阳 422000

作者简介:

夏果毅,湖南省人民医院/湖南师范大学附属第一医院硕士研究生,主要从事肝胆胰肿瘤方面的研究。

基金项目:

湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2019JJ50320;2020JJ5610);湖南省临床医疗技术创新引导基金资助项目(2020SK50915);湖南省肝胆胰肠诊疗能力提升基金资助项目(湘卫[2019]NO.118)。


A comparative study of extra- versus intra-Glissonian approach in laparoscopic anatomical right posterior lobe resection
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital/the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, China;2.Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shaoyang Central Hospital, Shaoyang, Hunan 422000, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 鞘外解剖法最早由日本学者Takasaki率先提出并且用于开腹肝切除,随着微创理念深入人心,外科手术逐渐步入微创时代,肝胆外科医生将鞘外解剖法灵活运用于腹腔镜肝切除术。本研究通过回顾性分析,比较腹腔镜下鞘外解剖法和鞘内解剖法处理右肝后叶肝蒂在解剖性右肝后叶切除的手术安全性以及近期疗效。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月—2019年9月湖南省人民医院行腹腔镜右肝后叶切除患者43例患者临床资料,其中,29例采用鞘外法处理右肝后叶肝蒂(鞘外组),14例采用鞘内法处理右肝后叶肝蒂(鞘内组),比较两组手术时间、术中失血量、住院天数、术后并发症、术后第3天肝功能指标(总胆红素,白蛋白,丙氨酸氨基转移酶,天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶)以及凝血酶原时间。结果 两组患者术前资料及疾病构成(均以原发性肝细胞癌为主)差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。鞘外组的平均手术时间明显短于鞘内组(191.72 min vs. 231.54 min,P=0.001),两组患者术中失血量,术后第3天肝功能指标、凝血酶原时间、住院时间、近期并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组均无围手术期死亡病例。结论 鞘外法与鞘内法在腹腔镜解剖性右肝后叶切除应用中安全性相当。但术前应该有充分的影像学资料以及对肝内管道解剖结构和变异情况充分了解。在严格掌握手术适应证,腹腔镜手术操作熟练的前提下运用鞘外法能缩短手术时间,提高手术效率。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Extra-Glissonian approach was first proposed by Japanese scholar Takasaki and used in open surgery. With the enhancement of the concept of minimal invasiveness, surgery has gradually entered into the minimally invasive era, and hepatobiliary surgeons flexibly applied the extra-Glissonian approach in laparoscopic hepatectomy. This study was conducted to compare the safety and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic extra-Glissonian approach and intra-Glissonian approach in handling the hepatic pedicle of the right posterior lobe during anatomical right posterior lobotomy through a retrospective analysis.Methods The clinical data of 43 patients who underwent laparoscopic right posterior lobotomy in Hunan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2015 to September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, the extra-Glissonian approach was used to deal with the hepatic pedicle of the right posterior lobe in 29 cases (extra-Glissonian group), and the intra-Glissonian approach was used to deal with the hepatic pedicle of the right posterior lobe in 14 cases (intra-Glissonian group). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, liver function indexes (total bilirubin, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase) on the third day after surgery and prothrombin time were compared between the two groups.Results There were no statistical differences in preoperative data and disease constitution (hepatocellular carcinoma was dominant type in either group) between the two groups of patients (all P>0.05). The average operative time in extra-Glissonian group was significantly shorter than that in intra-Glissonian group (191.72 min vs. 231.54 min, P=0.001), while other variables that included the intraoperative blood loss, liver function indexes and prothrombin time on the postoperative day 3, length of hospital stay and incidence of complications shortly after surgery showed no statistical differences between the two groups of patients (all P>0.05). No perioperative death occurred in both groups.Conclusion Extra-Glissonian approach and intra-glissonian approach are equally safe in laparoscopic anatomical right posterior lobectomy. However, there should be sufficient preoperative imaging data and a full understanding of the anatomical structure and variation of the intrahepatic duct. Under the premise of mastery of surgical indications and skilled operation of laparoscopic surgery, the application of the extra-Glissonian approach can shorten the operative time and improve the operation efficiency.

    表 1 两组患者一般资料比较Table 1 Comparison of general data between two groups
    表 2 两组患者术中、术后指标比较Table 2 Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative variables between two groups
    Fig.
    图1 术中图片 A:鞘外法解剖右后叶肝蒂;B:鞘内法解剖右后叶肝蒂Fig.1 Intraoperative pictures A: Anatomy of the right posterior liver pedicle by extrathecal method; B: Anatomy of the right posterior liver pedicle by intrathecal method
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

夏果毅,刘苏来,宋颖辉,谭志国,郑核,彭创. Glisson蒂鞘外与鞘内法在腹腔镜解剖性右肝后叶切除的对比研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2021,30(7):798-804.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2021.07.006

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-29
  • 最后修改日期:2021-06-20
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-08-25