重症急性胰腺炎感染期脓肿处理方式的选择:附5例报告
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

中南大学湘雅三医院 肝胆胰外科II,湖南 长沙 410013

作者简介:

彭程,中南大学湘雅三医院博士研究生,主要从事胰腺外科方面的研究。

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(81873589)。


Selection of treatment method for abscesses during the infection period of severe acute pancreatitis: a report of 5 cases
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery II, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)合并胰腺感染坏死(IPN)是临床中比较棘手的情况。进阶式微创引流或清创策略已被广泛认可,但刻板地执行进阶式策略并不能使所有患者受益,对于部分患者,在进阶式策略的基础上进行“跳跃”,直接进行开放清创更能提供救治机会。本文对5例SAP合并IPN患者的诊疗过程进行总结,以期为进阶式和跳跃式策略的选择提供参考。方法 回顾性分析5例SAP合并IPN患者的诊疗过程,并对相关文献进行复习。结果 5例患者中,男3例,女2例;年龄37~54岁,平均(45.2±6.06)岁;住院时间22~108 d,平均(68±38.03)d。1例患者经进阶式策略治疗成功,2例患者采用进阶式策略治疗效果较差,最终家属放弃治疗,2例患者在进阶式策略的基础上进行跳跃式策略治疗,取得较好效果。结论 SAP合并IPN的治疗应注重个体化,力求“一人一策”。进阶式策略可使大部分患者康复,但对于患者出现爆发性器官功能衰竭、重症感染、腹腔内存在广泛脓腔时,切勿刻板执行进阶式策略,在充分评估后选择跳跃式策略更能使患者受益。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) with infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a really challenging situation in clinical practice. A step-up, minimally invasive drainage or debridement is a widely accepted treatment approach. However, not all patients can benefit from a rigid implementation of step-up approach. In some patients, using a “skip-up” strategy based on step-up approach to perform a direct open debridement may provide a chance for treatment. Here, the authors summarized the treatment process of five patients with SAP complicated with IPN, so as to provide a reference for the selection of step-up or skip-up approaches.Methods The diagnosis and treatment process of five SAP patients with IPN was retrospectively analyzed, and the relevant literature was reviewed.Results Of the 5 patients, 3 cases were males and 2 cases were females, whose age ranged from 37 to 54 years, with an average age of (45.2±6.06) years. The length of hospital stay ranged from 22 to 108 d, with an average of (68±38.03) d. One patient was successfully cured after treatment by a step-up method, and two patients had a poor response after treatment with a step-up approach and eventually treatment was given up their families. Two patients achieved a better result after treatment using a skip-up strategy based on the step-up procedure.Conclusion Individualized treatment is critical for SAP patients complicated with IPN, striving for “one patient one plan”. A large proportion of patients can benefit from the treatment in a step-up approach. However, the rigid implementation of step-up approach must be avoided in patients presenting with fulminant organ failure, severe infection, and extensive abdominal abscesses, for whom a skip-up approach based on sufficient assessment may be more effective.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

彭程,臧龙军,李志强,朱红伟,陈浪,孙吉春,聂晚频,余枭.重症急性胰腺炎感染期脓肿处理方式的选择:附5例报告[J].中国普通外科杂志,2021,30(9):1031-1039.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2021.09.006

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-03
  • 最后修改日期:2021-08-17
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-10-09