生物可分解吻合环与手工缝合在肠吻合术中的随机对照研究
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

胡伟

基金项目:


A randomized controlled study on the application of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and manual suture in intestinal anastomosis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    目的: 评估生物可分解吻合环在肠道吻合手术中的应用。方法:将需行肠吻合术的患者随机分成两组:吻合环组92例,手工缝合组94例,共186例。术后分别记录与吻合口有关的并发症、肠功能恢复时间等情况。127例结肠肿瘤患者(吻合环组62例,手工缝合组65例)术后随访时观察吻合口炎症发生的情况。两组病例一般资料分布均衡。结果:2例(2.17%)患者术中出现使用吻合环困难。两组各死亡1例,但均与手术操作无关。术后肠功能恢复时间:吻合环组(61.4±8.6)h,手工缝合组(68.3±9.7)h,两组之间差异无显著性(P>0.05)。吻合环组发生术后吻合瘘1例(1.1%),手工缝合组发生2例(2.1%)(P>0.05);吻合环组发生术后吻合口出血2例(2.2%),手工组缝合组发生1例(1.1%)(P>0.05);两组术后均未发生吻合口梗阻;吻合环组发生吻合口炎症2例(3.2%),手工缝合组发生13例(20.0%),两组之间差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论: 生物可分解吻合环是一种安全有效的肠吻合装置。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective:To assess the application of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring(BAR) in intestinal anastomosis. Methods:One hundred and eighty-six patients who undergoing intestinal anastomosis were randomly allocated to biofragmentable anastomosis ring group (BAR group, n=92) and manual suture group (control group n=94). The restoration time of bowel fanctions, and the post-operative complications related to anastomotic site were recorded in each group. One hundred tweenty-seven patients with colonic carcinoma(62 patients in BAR group and 65 patients in manual group) were followed up post-operatively, and the incidence of inflammatory reactions at the anastomotic site was registered. Results:In 2 patients(2.17%) it was difficult to use the BAR procedure. One mortality was recorded in each group, but were not related to anastomotic procedure. In BAR group and manual group, post-operative bowel restoration time was 61.4±8.6h and 68.3±9.7h respectively(P>0.05). In BAR group and manual group, anastomotic leaks, anastomotic bleeding and obstruction occurred in 1, 2; 2,1 and 0,0 patients respectively(all P>0.05). Anastomotic inflammatory reaction occurred in 2 patients(3.2%) in BAR group and 13 patients(20.0%) in manual group. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.01). Conclusions:BAR is a safe and effective device for intestinal anastomsis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡伟,司中洲,李一宁.生物可分解吻合环与手工缝合在肠吻合术中的随机对照研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2006,15(6):15-454.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2006.06.015

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2006-06-25