腹腔镜手术修复LC相关胆道损伤的安全性与可行性分析
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

1.宁夏医科大学第三临床医学院,宁夏 银川 750002;2.宁夏回族自治区人民医院 肝胆外科,宁夏 银川 750002

作者简介:

杨志琦,宁夏医科大学第三临床医学院/宁夏回族自治区人民医院主治医师,主要从事肝移植免疫耐受及三维可视化在肝胆胰脾外科应用方面的研究(

基金项目:

宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划基金资助项目(2019BEG03039)。


Analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for repairing LC-related biliary injury
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The Third Clinical Medical College of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750002, China;2.Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan 750002, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)术中胆道损伤一旦发生,可能造成患者身心双重痛苦,丧失其微创治疗的真正意义。然而,在临床实践中却是胆道外科医师无法完全避免的不良事件。随着微创外科技术的不断发展,腹腔镜手术修复LC术中胆道损伤的案例逐渐被报道,但其安全性和有效性受到部分学者质疑,因而成为具有争议的话题。笔者就近年来开展的腹腔镜手术修复LC相关胆道损伤患者资料进行总结,探讨其可行性及安全性。方法 回顾性分析宁夏回族自治区人民医院肝胆外科于2019年3月—2023年3月11例行腹腔镜手术修复的LC相关胆道损伤患者临床与随访资料。LC术中胆道损伤以可疑胆汁漏及术中胆道造影为判断依据,LC术后胆道损伤根据患者临床表现及腹部计算机断层增强扫描、磁共振胆胰管成像及腹腔镜探查评估与确定。结果 11例患者中,男性4例、女性7例。患者胆道损伤分型采用Strasberg-Bismuth分型,其中C型3例、D型1例、E1型1例、E2型3例、E3型2例、E4型1例。所有患者均顺利完成胆道损伤修复手术,其中7例行LC术中即时胆道损伤修复手术(6例应用完全腹腔镜下胆管对端吻合术或修补术、1例应用腹腔镜辅助小切口肝肠吻合术),4例行LC术后早期胆道损伤修复手术(1例应用完全腹腔镜胆肠吻合术、3例采用腹腔镜辅助小切口肝肠吻合术)。11例患者平均修复手术时间(173.63±44.33)min,中位术中出血量100(90~140)mL。所有患者围术期无死亡,未见胆管吻合口或肝肠吻合口胆汁漏、胆道出血等并发症发生,平均住院时间为(14.27±2.93)d。所有患者随访时间平均为(38.09±17.23)个月,除外1例Strasberg-Bismuth C型胆道损伤于腹腔镜右肝管修补术后3个月合并右肝管狭窄再次行腹腔镜下右肝管空肠吻合术取得痊愈,其余患者随访期间未见胆道狭窄、反流性胆管炎等并发症出现。结论 在具有相当腹腔镜技术的胆道外科中心应用腹腔镜技术修复LC相关胆道损伤是相对安全可行的,但应当针对胆管损伤Strasberg-Bismuth分型,准确把握手术适应证,以合理的修复手术策略宜早实施。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Once bile duct injury occurs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), it can cause both physical and psychological suffering for the patient, negating the actual benefits of minimally invasive surgery. However, it is an adverse event that biliary surgeons in clinical practice cannot altogether avoid. With the ongoing development of minimally invasive surgical techniques, cases of laparoscopic repair of bile duct injury during LC have increasingly been reported. However, some scholars have questioned the safety and efficacy of these procedures, making it a controversial topic. This study summarized the data of patients undergoing laparoscopic repair for LC-related bile duct injuries performed in recent years and explored their feasibility and safety.Methods The clinical and follow-up data of 11 cases of LC-related bile duct injuries repaired through laparoscopic surgery at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region People's Hospital, from March 2019 to March 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Bile duct injury during LC was diagnosed based on suspected bile leakage and intraoperative cholangiography. Bile duct injury after LC was assessed and confirmed through clinical manifestations, enhanced abdominal CT, MRCP, and laparoscopic exploration.Results Among the 11 patients, 4 were males and 7 were females. The Strasberg-Bismuth classification was used to categorize bile duct injury of patients, which included 3 cases of type C, 1 case of type D, 1 case of type E1, 3 cases of type E2, 2 cases of type E3, and 1 case of type E4. All patients completed the repair surgery of bile duct injury, of whom 7 cases underwent immediate intraoperative repair surgery (6 cases underwent total laparoscopic bile duct end-to-end anastomosis or repair, 1 case underwent laparoscopic-assisted small incision hepaticojejunostomy), and 4 cases underwent early bile duct injury repair surgery following LC (1 underwent total laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis and 3 underwent laparoscopic-assisted small incision hepaticojejunostomy). The average time for the repair surgery was (173.63±44.33) minutes, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 100 (90–140) mL. There were no perioperative deaths, and no complications such as bile leakage or bile duct bleeding at the anastomosis sites were observed. The average length of hospital stay was (14.27±2.93) d. The average follow-up time for all patients was (38.09±17.23) months except for one patient with Strasberg-Bismuth type C bile duct injury who developed right hepatic duct stricture three months after laparoscopic proper hepatic duct repair and was successfully treated with laparoscopic right hepaticojejunostomy, no other complications, such as bile duct strictures or reflux cholangitis were observed during the follow-up period.Conclusion In hepatobiliary centers with advanced laparoscopic techniques, performing laparoscopic surgery to repair LC-related bile duct injury is relatively safe and feasible. However, it is essential to accurately assess the indications for surgery based on the Strasberg-Bismuth classification of bile duct injury and to implement an appropriate repair strategy as early as possible.

    表 2 11例LC相关胆道损伤患者修复手术情况Table 2 Repair surgery details of 11 patients with LC-related bile duct injury
    图1 术中IOC辨识胆道变异并确定Strasberg-Bismuth C型胆道损伤 A:胆管下开口;B:自胆管下开口造影,胆管树似乎完整显示,但实际右肝区域无肝管显示;C:胆管上开口;D:自胆管上开口造影,肝右后叶胆管显示,提示胆囊管起自右肝管;E:胆道支撑管置入;F:右肝管对端吻合术Fig.1 Intraoperative cholangiography identifying biliary anomalies and confirming Strasberg-Bismuth type C bile duct injury A: Lower opening of the bile duct; B: Cholangiography from the lower opening shows an apparently intact bile duct tree, but no hepatic ducts are visible in the right hepatic region; C: Upper opening of the bile duct; D: Cholangiography from the upper opening shows the right posterior hepatic duct, suggesting that the cystic duct originates from the right hepatic duct; E: Placement of the biliary stent; F: End-to-end anastomosis of the right hepatic duct
    图2 腹腔镜即时修复胆道损伤Strasberg-Bismuth E2型 A:腹腔镜探查胆管损伤情况;B:确定胆管损伤类型(黑色虚线指引损伤胆管长度);C:对端胆管后壁吻合;D:胆管重新开口放置T管;E:对端胆管前壁吻合;F:术中修复后IOC检查;G:术后3个月复查T管造影Fig.2 Laparoscopic immediate repair of Strasberg-Bismuth type E2 bile duct injury A: Laparoscopic exploration of the bile duct injury; B: Identification of the bile duct injury type (black dashed line indicates the length of the injured bile duct); C: End-to-end anastomosis of the posterior wall of the bile duct; D: Reopening of the bile duct to place a T-tube; E: End-to-end anastomosis of the anterior wall of the bile duct; F: Intraoperative cholangiography after repair; G: T-tube cholangiography at the 3-month postoperative follow-up
    图3 腹腔镜早期修复胆道损伤Strasberg-Bismuth E3型 A:修复手术前MRCP;B:肝门区胆汁瘤形成;C:暴露损伤胆管区域;D:胆道镜探查胆管上开口;E:胆道镜探查胆管下开口;F:肝管空肠吻合术;G:修复手术后MRCPFig.3 Laparoscopic early repair of Strasberg-Bismuth type E3 bile duct injury A: Pre-repair MRCP; B: Formation of a biloma in the hepatic hilum; C: Exposure of the injured bile duct area; D: Choledochoscopy exploring the upper opening of the bile duct; E: Choledochoscopy exploring the lower opening of the bile duct; F: Hepaticojejunostomy; G: Post-repair MRCP
    表 1 11例LC相关胆道损伤患者一般资料Table 1 General information of 11 patients with LC-related bile duct injury
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨志琦,吴浪,丁洋,刘晶,闫文涛,李明皓.腹腔镜手术修复LC相关胆道损伤的安全性与可行性分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2024,33(8):1230-1239.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2024.08.004

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-19
  • 最后修改日期:2024-08-01
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-09-05