加速康复外科路径下腹腔镜全胃切除术后完全腹腔镜食管-空肠π吻合的临床疗效
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

江苏大学附属医院 胃肠外科,江苏 镇江 212001

作者简介:

郭建,江苏大学附属医院硕士研究生,主要从事胃肠外科方面的研究。

基金项目:

江苏省镇江市重点研发计划(社会发展)资助项目(SH2018082,SH2019089)。


Clinical efficacy of totally laparoscopic π-shaped esophagojejunostomy following laparoscopic gastrectomy under the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 完全腹腔镜下全胃切除食管-空肠π吻合是一种新的腹腔镜下全胃切除术后全消化道重建方式,该方法与传统腹腔镜辅助食管-空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术在传统临床路径下的比较已有较多研究,但在加速康复外科(ERAS)路径下两者临床效果比较的研究较少,本研究比较ERAS路径中腹腔镜全胃切除术后全腹腔镜食管-空肠π吻合术与腹腔镜辅助下Roux-en-Y吻合的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析江苏大学附属医院2017年6月—2019年12月65例行胃癌手术的患者临床资料,所有患者进入ERAS路径,均行腹腔镜全胃切除术,其中30例消化道重建采用完全腹腔镜食管-空肠π吻合术(π吻合组),35例消化道重建采用传统腹腔镜辅助下食管-空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术(Roux-en-Y吻合组),比较两组患者的术中、术后及随访的相关指标。结果 两组患者术前资料具有可比性。π吻合组在切口长度、术后首次下床时间、肛门首次排气时间、进食时间、术后疼痛及住院时间方面均优于Roux-en-Y吻合组(均P<0.05);手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫总数、住院总费用以及术后并发症,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);在术后随访中,π吻合组4例、Roux-en-Y吻合组6例发生不同程度的转移与复发,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);π吻合组患者的1年生存率为73.33%,Roux-en-Y吻合组为77.14%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 腹腔镜全胃切除术后,采用完全腹腔镜全胃切除食管-空肠π吻合手术具有创伤小,恢复快,患者住院时间短等优点,在ERAS路径中更有利于其优势的发挥。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Totally laparoscopic π-shaped esophagojejunostomy is a new digestive tract reconstruction method after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. There are a number of studies comparing this method with the conventional laparoscopic-assisted Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy under the traditional clinical pathway, but few reports comparing the two methods under the clinical pathway of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the clinical effects of totally laparoscopic π-shaped esophagojejunostomy and laparoscopic-assisted Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy following laparoscopic total gastrectomy in ERAS pathway.Methods The clinical data of 65 patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer from June 2017 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients entered the ERAS pathway and underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Of them, totally laparoscopic π-shaped esophagojejunostomy was used to reconstruct the digestive tract in 30 cases (π-shaped anastomosis group) and laparoscopic-assisted Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy was used to restore the digestive tract in 35 cases (Roux-en-Y anastomosis group). The intra- and postoperative variables and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.Results The preoperative date of the two groups were comparable. The incision length, the time to first postoperative ambulation, time to first anal gas passage, time to first food intake, postoperative pain and length of hospitalization in π-shaped anastomosis group were superior to those in anastomosis Roux-en-Y group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, total number of lymph node dissection, total hospitalization cost and overall incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (all P>0.05). During postoperative follow-up, different degrees of metastasis and recurrence occurred in 4 patients in π-shaped anastomosis group and 6 patients in Roux-en-Y anastomosis group, and the difference had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The one-year survival rate was 73.33% in π-shaped anastomosis group and 77.14% in Roux-en-Y anastomosis group, and the difference had no statistical significance (P>0.05).Conclusion After laparoscopic gastrectomy, using totally laparoscopic π-shaped esophagojejunostomy has the advantages of small trauma, quick recovery and short hospitalization period, and its advantages can be enhanced with ERAS pathway.

    表 4 两组患者术后并发症比较Table 4 Comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups
    表 5 Table 5
    图1 食管-空肠π形吻合术中照片 A:离断十二指肠;B:束带牵拉暴露食管,用超声刀在食管右侧切开一小开口;C:距Treitz韧带15 cm裁剪小肠系膜;D:食管-空肠侧侧吻合;E:离断食管和空肠,同时关闭共同开口;F:食管-空肠侧侧吻合的最顶端予3-0倒刺线缝合加强两针;G:电钩在小肠对系膜缘开一小孔;H:空肠-空肠侧侧吻合;I:3-0倒刺线缝合共同开口Fig.1 Intraoperative images of π-shaped esophagojejunostomy A: Division of the duodenum; B: Pulling to exposure of the esophagus by a belt, and making a small incision on the right side of the esophagus with an ultrasonic knife; C: Trimming small the mesostenium approximately 15 cm from the Treitz ligament; D: Side-to-side esophagojejunal anastomosis; E: Division of the esophagus and jejunum and closing the common opening at the same time; F: Suturing the top of side-to-side esophagojejunal anastomosis with 3-0 barbed suture for reinforced stitches; G: Making a small hole with the electric hook in the mesangial margin of the small intestine; H: Jejunojejunal side-to-side anastomosis; I: Suturing the common opening with 3-0 barbed suture
    图2 两组患者18个月的生存曲线Fig.2 Survival curves of 18 months of the two groups of patients
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郭建,孙康,瞿建国,陈吉祥,范昕,谢嵘,党胜春,金玺.加速康复外科路径下腹腔镜全胃切除术后完全腹腔镜食管-空肠π吻合的临床疗效[J].中国普通外科杂志,2022,31(8):1080-1088.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2022.08.011

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-27
  • 最后修改日期:2022-04-12
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-02