T2期胆囊癌最佳肝切除范围的Meta分析
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

昆明医科大学第二附属医院 肝胆胰外科二病区,云南 昆明 650101

作者简介:

祝家海,昆明医科大学第二附属医院硕士研究生,主要从事普通外科疾病临床方面的研究。

基金项目:

云南省卫健委学科带头人培养计划基金资助项目(D-2019012)。


Meta-analysis of the optimal resection scope of hepatectomy for T2 gallbladder carcinoma
Author:
Affiliation:

The Second Division of Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650101, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 胆囊癌(GBC)是胆道系统恶性肿瘤中最常见的肿瘤,占全球胆道恶性肿瘤的80%~95%,预后较差,5年总生存(OS)率仅为10%~25%。目前,根治性切除是唯一可能治愈GBC的方法,但对于T2期GBC的肝切除范围各指南推荐不一。因此,本研究对T2期GBC最佳肝切除范围进行系统评价。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Web of science、Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库,根据纳入和排除标准选取文献,使用NOS评分评估纳入文献的质量,采用RevMan 5.4版软件分析评估各组患者1、3、5年的生存差异。结果 最终纳入8篇文献,8篇文献均纳入T2期GBC,其中2篇文献纳入T2a期和T2b期GBC。Meta分析结果显示,T2期GBC行距胆囊床2 cm以上的肝组织切除术及肝IVb+V段切除术,R0与R1切除的1、3、5年OS率差异均无统计学意义(OR=0.70,95% CI=0.45~1.09,P=0.12;OR=1.10,95% CI=0.79~1.53,P=0.58;OR=1.18,95% CI=0.89~1.56,P=0.25);R0切除的1、5年OS率差异均无统计学意义(OR=0.84,95% CI=0.49~1.44,P=0.53;OR=0.89,95% CI=0.64~1.25,P=0.51),而3年OS率差异有统计学意义(OR=1.46,95% CI=1.03~2.07,P=0.03);T2a期和T2b期GBC行距胆囊床2 cm以上的肝组织切除术及肝IVb+V段切除术,R0切除的术后5年OS率差异均无统计学意义(OR=0.55,95% CI=0.18~1.64,P=0.28;OR=0.99,95% CI=0.49~2.00,P=0.97)。结论 T2期GBC可行距胆囊床2 cm以上的肝组织切除术或肝IVb+V段切除术,以达到R0切除为目的。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary system, accounting for 80%-95% of biliary malignancies worldwide, and has a poor prognosis with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of only 10%-25%. At present, radical resection is the only possible way to cure GBC, but the recommended scopes of hepatic resection for T2 GBC are different in different guidelines. Therefore, this study was conducted to systematically evaluate the optimal scope of hepatectomy for T2 GBC.Methods Computer retrieval was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database and VIP Database according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of eligible literature was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RevMan version 5.4 software was used to analysis the difference of 1-, 3-, 5-year OS rate of patients of each group.Results Finally, 8 papers were selected, all included stage T2 GBC, and two of which included stage T2a and T2b GBC. Meta-analysis results showed that there was no difference in R0 and R1 section of stage T2 GBC between the wedge liver resection with at least a 2-cm margin from the gallbladder bed and liver segment Ⅳb+V resection in 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rate (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.45-1.09, P=0.12; OR=1.10, 95% CI=0.79-1.53, P=0.58; OR=1.18, 95% CI=0.89-1.56, P=0.25). There was no significant difference in 1- and 5-year OS rates for R0 resection (OR=0.84, 95% CI=0.49-1.44, P=0.53; OR=0.89, 95% CI=0.64-1.25, P=0.51), while the 3-year OS rate was significantly different (OR=1.46, 95% CI=1.03-2.07, P=0.03). There was no significant difference in the 5-year OS rate of R0 section of stage T2a and stage T2b GBC with liver tissue resection with at least a 2-cm margin from the gallbladder bed and the liver segment Ⅳb+V resection (OR=0.55, 95% CI = 0.18-1.64, P=0.28; OR=0.99, 95% CI =0.49-2.00, P=0.97).Conclusions Both liver tissue resection with at least a 2-cm margin from the gallbladder bed and the liver segment Ⅳb+V resection can be performed to achieve R0 resection for stage T2 GBC.

    表 2 T2a期GBC纳入文献基本特征及质量评价Table 2 Basic characteristics and quality evaluation of the included literature for stage T2a GBC
    表 3 T2b期GBC纳入文献基本特征及质量评价Table 3 Basic characteristics and quality evaluation of the included literature for stage T2b GBC
    表 1 T2期GBC纳入文献基本特征及质量评价Table 1 Basic characteristics and quality evaluation of the included literature for T2 GBC
    表 4 Meta分析结果及异质性分析Table 4 Heterogeneity analysis and Meta-analysis
    图1 文献检索及筛选流程Fig.1 Literature search and screening process
    图2 T2期GBC肝楔形切除术及肝IVb+V段切除术后生存分析(R0切除和R1切除) A: 1年生存分析;B:3年生存分析;C:5年生存分析Fig.2 Survival analysis of T2 GBC patients after wedge resection and IVb+V segment resection (R0 resection and R1 resection) A: 1-year survival analysis; B: 3-year survival analysis; C: 5-year survival analysis
    图3 T2期GBC肝楔形切除术及肝IVb+V段切除术后生存分析(R0切除) A:1年生存分析;B:3年生存分析;C:5年生存分析Fig.3 Survival analysis of T2 GBC patients after wedge resection and IVb+V segment resection (R0 resection) A: 1-year survival analysis; B: 3-year survival analysis; C: 5-year survival analysis
    图4 T2a期GBC肝楔形切除术及肝IVb+V段切除术后5年生存分析(R0切除)Fig.4 Five-year survival analysis after wedge resection and IVb+V segment resection of T2a GBC (R0 resection)
    图5 T2b期GBC肝楔形切除术及肝IVb+V段切除术后5年生存分析(R0切除)Fig.5 Five-year survival analysis after wedge resection and IVb+V segment resection of T2b GBC (R0 resection)
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

祝家海,邵汉瑞,王鑫乐,易小田,赵松凌,朱亚,邹浩. T2期胆囊癌最佳肝切除范围的Meta分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2022,31(8):987-996.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2022.08.001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-22
  • 最后修改日期:2022-07-16
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-02