肝硬化门静脉高压症患者超声内镜引导门静脉压力梯度测定:附52例报告
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

1.中南大学湘雅三医院,肝胆胰门静脉高压症外科,湖南 长沙 410013;2.中南大学湘雅三医院,麻醉科,湖南 长沙 410013;3.湖南省门静脉高压症治疗研究中心,湖南 长沙 410013;4.中南大学微创外科研究所, 湖南 长沙 410013

作者简介:

雷钊,中南大学湘雅三医院主治医师,主要从事肝胆胰外科微创治疗方面的研究(

基金项目:

湖南省自然科学青年基金资助项目(2020JJ5853) 。


Endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient measurement in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension: a report of 52 cases
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Portal Hypertension Surgery, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China;2.Department of Anesthesiology, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China;3.Hunan Treatment and Research Center for Portal Hypertension, Changsha 410013, China;4.Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 门静脉高压症的特征是门静脉压力梯度(PPG)增加,然而,传统的PPG测定方法困难、风险大,临床很难常规实施。前期的动物实验及人体试验均显示了超声内镜引导门静脉压力梯度(EUS-PPG)测定技术的可行性及准确性,且近期一项前瞻性研究在肝小静脉闭塞所致的急性或亚急性门静脉高压症患者中验证了EUS-PPG与肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)存在一致性。然而,对于肝硬化门静脉高压症患者进行EUS-PPG测定的相关临床研究在国内尚未见相关报道。因此,本研究探讨肝硬化门静脉高压症EUS-PPG测定的准确性、可行性及安全性。方法 选取2022年3月—2022年8月中南大学湘雅三医院收治的52例肝硬化门静脉高压症进行EUS-PPG测定,分析EUS-PPG测定结果及其与患者临床特征的关系。结果 52例患者中,47例既往或近期有食管胃静脉曲张出血史(14例既往经历过脾切除断流手术)。51例(98%)成功实施EUS-PPG,1例技术失败。门静脉穿刺途径分别为经胃壁(42例)或经十二指肠(9例),经胃壁穿刺肝静脉(10例)或肝后下腔静脉(41例),操作时长(15.5±3.4)min。51例患者的平均门静脉压力值(21.0±7.1)mmHg,肝静脉压力值(5.7±5.5)mmHg,PPG为(15.3±4.9)mmHg。5例患者同期分别穿刺门静脉和胃左静脉测压,两者压力值结果显示高度相关性(r=0.99,P=0.000 66)。所有患者均未观察到不良事件。既往行脾切除断流手术患者PPG明显低于未经历该手术的患者(12.8 mmHg vs. 16.3 mmHg,P<0.05);有食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血史患者PPG明显高于无该病史的患者(16.8 mmHg vs. 11.8 mmHg,P<0.05);不同肝功能Child-Pugh分级患者间EUS-PPG差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 EUS-PPG是门静脉和肝静脉压力差值直接测定新方法,该方法准确可靠、操作安全可行。当常规途径门静脉穿刺存在技术困难时可选择经过十二指肠穿刺门静脉或穿刺扩张的门静脉主要属支代替。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Portal hypertension is characterized by an increased portal pressure gradient (PPG). However, the conventional method for PPG measurement is difficult and risky, so it is challenging to implement in a clinical setting routinely. Previous animal experiments and human tests have shown the feasibility and accuracy of the endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement techniques. A recent prospective study involving patients with subacute portal hypertension caused by occlusion of the small hepatic veins verified the consistency between EUS-PPG and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). However, there is no report assessing EUS-PPG measurement in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension in China. Therefore, this study was performed to investigate the accuracy, feasibility, and safety of EUS-PPG measurement in cirrhotic portal hypertension.Methods A total of 52 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension admitted to the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from March 2022 to August 2022 were enrolled for EUS-PPG measurement. The EUS-PPG measurement results and their associations with the clinical features of patients were analyzed.Results In the 52 patients, 47 cases had a previous or recent history of esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding (14 cases had previous devascularization and splenectomy). EUS-PPG was successfully performed in 51 cases (98%), and technical failure occurred in one case. The approaches for portal vein puncture included that through the gastric wall (42 cases) or the duodenum (9 cases) and punch of the hepatic vein (10 cases) or retrohepatic inferior vena cava (41 cases) through the gastric wall. The operative time was (15.5±3.4) min. Of the 51 patients, the average portal vein pressure was (21.0±7.1) mmHg, the hepatic vein pressure was (5.7±5.5) mmHg and the PPG was (15.3±4.9) mmHg. Five patients underwent simultaneous portal vein and left gastric vein puncture for pressure measurement, and the results showed that the two pressure values were highly correlated (r=0.99, P=0.000 66). No adverse events were observed in all patients. The PPG value in patients who had previously undergone devascularization and splenectomy was significantly lower than that in those who had not undergone this procedure (12.8 mmHg vs. 16.3 mmHg, P<0.05), the PPG value in patients with a history of esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding was significantly higher than that in those with no history of this complication (16.8 mmHg vs. 11.8 mmHg, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in PPG value among patients with different Child-Pugh classifications (P>0.05).Conclusion EUS-PPG is a new method for directly determining the pressure difference between the portal vein and hepatic vein, which is accurate, reliable, safe, and feasible. Transduodenal portal vein puncture or puncture of the dilated main branches of the portal vein can be performed instead when technical difficulties occur during conventional portal vein puncture.

    表 3 5例患者的PVP、胃左静脉测压值(mmHg)Table 3 Values of the PVP and left gastric vein pressure of the 5 patients (mmHg)
    表 1 52例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者一般资料Table 1 General information on the 52 cases of cirrhotic portal hypertension patients
    图1 相关实物照片 A:穿刺针;B:测压管路连接方法;C:HVP测压模块读数;D:PVP测压模块读数Fig.1 Pictures of the real objects A: The puncture needle; B: Connection method of the pressure measuring pipe; C: Indications of the HVP measurement module; D: Indications of the PVP measurement module
    图2 EUS-PPG穿刺术中照片 A-B:门静脉穿刺过程;C-D:肝后下腔穿刺过程;E-F:左肝静脉穿刺过程,G:胃左静脉穿刺Fig.2 Images of EUS-PPG puncture A-B: Portal vein puncture process; C-D: Retrohepatic inferior vena cava puncture process; E-F: Left hepatic vein puncture process; G: Left gastric vein puncture
    图3 EUS引导下同期分别穿刺门静脉与胃左静脉测压值的相关性分析Fig.3 Correlation between the pressure values of EUS-guided simultaneous puncture of the portal vein and the left gastric vein
    图4 手术组与非手术组间PPG比较Fig.4 Comparison of PPG values between the surgical group and non-surgical group
    图5 出血组与未出血组间PPG比较Fig.5 Comparison of the PPG values between the bleeding group and the non-bleeding group
    图6 不同肝功能Child-Pugh分级患者PPG比较Fig.6 Comparison of the PPG values among patients with different Child-Pugh liver function classifications
    表 2 EUS-PPG测定值及穿刺路径(n=51)Table 2 EUS-PPG measurement values and puncture approaches (n=51)
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

雷钊,罗蓉昆,卢焕元,张瑞,罗宏武,罗少彬,宋锦涛,伍园园,蒋志云,彭茜茜,尹欣林,刘浔阳,黄飞舟,邓刚.肝硬化门静脉高压症患者超声内镜引导门静脉压力梯度测定:附52例报告[J].中国普通外科杂志,2023,32(1):101-109.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2023.01.009

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-02
  • 最后修改日期:2022-12-13
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-03