富血小板血浆治疗下肢缺血性难愈创面的临床观察
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

1.中国医学科学院老年医学研究院/国家老年医学中心/北京医院 血管外科,北京 100730;2.河南中医药大学第一附属医院 周围血管科,河南 郑州 450000

作者简介:

刁永鹏,北京医院副主任医师,主要从事外周血管基础与临床方面的研究。

基金项目:

河南省中医药科学研究专项基金资助项目(2021JDZY052)。


Clinical observation of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of ischemic non-healing wounds in the lower limbs
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Institute of Geriatrics, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/National Center for Geriatrics/Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China;2.Department of Peripheral Vascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450000, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 下肢缺血性难愈创面在经过积极腔内介入或开放手术重建肢体血运后,仍然存在住院周期长、治疗难度大、费用较高等,且创面愈合效果不佳。富血小板血浆(PRP)具有制备简单、来源丰富、相对安全无副作用等优势,可直接作用于创面并增强创面愈合进程,已广泛应用于难愈创面修复领域,但对于下肢缺血性难愈创面少有报道。本研究探讨PRP在下肢缺血性难愈合创面治疗中的临床疗效及安全性,以期为此类难愈性创面的临床治疗提供参考和借鉴。方法 在2021年1月—2022年12月北京医院血管外科、河南中医药大学第一附属医院周围血管科收治的下肢缺血性难愈创面患者中,选取患肢踝肱指数(ABI)>0.5~<0.9、创面床分期为红期(肉芽组织期)、创面面积>1~<20 cm2、无死腔或引流不畅的难愈性创面;抽取患者自体静脉血50 mL,采用密度梯度离心法二次离心,制备PRP及PRP凝胶。在戒烟、降脂、抗凝、抗血小板、改善循环、降压、降糖全身治疗基础上,创面清创后局部给予PRP创基直接注射和创面外用PRP凝胶联合治疗,隔7 d换药1次。观察14 d后创面面积(依据创面面积判定疗效)、肉芽评分、渗出量评分、创面深度评分,以及炎性指标[白细胞(WBC)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)水平、红细胞沉降率(ESR)水平]、疼痛评分与不良反应发生情况。结果 经PRP治疗14 d后,患者创面面积较治疗前明显缩小[(10.16±4.07)cm2 vs.(5.11±3.38)cm2P=0.000],其中创面面积痊愈8例(12.7%)、显效25例(39.7%)、有效24例(38.1%)、无效6例(9.5%),总有效率90.5%;创面局部深度、肉芽组织及渗出量量化评分均较治疗前明显改善(均P<0.05)。治疗后均未应用抗生素治疗,炎性指标WBC、CRP、ESR水平较前降低,患者自我疼痛评分较前减低(均P<0.05);治疗过程中均未见明显不良反应。结论 PRP创基直接注射和创面局部外用凝胶的联合方法,可促进肉芽生长、上皮爬行,加快创面愈合过程,抑制创面炎症反应,降低患者疼痛感,用于治疗下肢缺血性难愈创面安全有效。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims After undergoing active endovascular intervention or open surgery to reconstruct limb blood flow, patients with ischemic non-healing wounds in the lower limbs still face long hospital stays, high treatment difficulty, high costs, and poor wound healing outcomes. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is advantageous due to its simple preparation, abundant sources, relative safety, and lack of side effects. It can be directly applied to wounds to enhance the healing process and has been widely used in the field of non-healing wound repair. However, there are few reports on its use for ischemic non-healing wounds in the lower limbs. This study was performed to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of PRP in the treatment of ischemic non-healing wounds in the lower limbs, so as to provide a reference for clinical treatment of such refractory wounds.Methods From January 2021 to December 2022, patients with ischemic non-healing wounds in the lower limbs admitted to the Vascular Surgery Department of Beijing Hospital and the Peripheral Vascular Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were selected. Patients had an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of >0.5 to <0.9, wound bed tissue in the red phase (granulation tissue phase), wound area >1 to <20 cm2, and non-healing wounds without dead space or poor drainage. Autologous venous blood (50 mL) was drawn from patients and centrifuged using a density gradient centrifugation method to prepare PRP and PRP gel. On the basis of systemic treatments including smoking cessation, lipid-lowering, anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, circulation improvement, blood pressure reduction, and blood sugar control, debridement was performed, followed by direct PRP injection into the wound base and external application of PRP gel to the wound, with dressing changes every 7 d. After 14 d, wound area (clinical efficacy was determined according to wound area reduction), granulation score, exudate score, and wound depth score, as well as inflammatory markers (CRP, WBC, ESR), pain score, and adverse reactions were observed.Results After 14 days of PRP treatment, the wound area significantly reduced compared to that before treatment [(10.16±4.07) cm2 vs. (5.107±3.38) cm2, P=0.000]. Among the patients, 8 cases (12.7%) were fully healed, 25 cases (39.7%) showed significant improvement, 24 cases (38.1%) were effective, and 6 cases (9.5%) were ineffective, with a total effectiveness rate of 90.5%. The local wound depth, granulation tissue, and exudate scores significantly improved compared to those before treatment (all P<0.05). No antibiotics were used after treatment, and inflammatory markers (WBC, CRP, ESR) were decreased, and patients' self-reported pain score was reduced (all P<0.05). No significant adverse reactions were observed during the treatment process.Conclusion The combined method of direct PRP injection into the wound base and topical application of PRP gel can promote granulation growth, epithelial crawling, accelerate wound healing, inhibit wound inflammatory response, and reduce patient pain, proving to be a safe and effective treatment for ischemic non-healing wounds in the lower limbs.

    表 1 治疗前后主要观察指标比较[n(%)]Table 1 Comparison of main outcomes before and after treatment [n (%)]
    图1 PRP的制备 A:静脉采血;B:第一次离心4 min(2 000 r/min);C:移取中上层;D:第二次离心6 min(4 000 r/min);E:配制激活剂;F:PRP凝胶Fig.1 Preparation of PRP A: Venous blood collection; B: First centrifugation for 4 min (2 000 r/min); C: Transfer of the middle and upper layers; D: Second centrifugation for 6 m (4 000 r/min); E: Preparation of activator; F: PRP gel
    图2 PRP治疗前后创面对比 A:术前创面;B:PRP创基注射及外用;C:7 d后换药;D:14 d后换药Fig.2 Comparison of wounds before and after PRP treatment A: Pre-treatment wound; B: PRP base injection and topical application; C: Dressing change after 7 d; D: Dressing change after 14 d
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刁永鹏,张榜,吴志远,刘平,杜萌萌,兰勇,许政曦,周涛,李拥军.富血小板血浆治疗下肢缺血性难愈创面的临床观察[J].中国普通外科杂志,2024,33(6):952-960.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2024.06.011

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-16
  • 最后修改日期:2023-10-25
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-09