内脏脂肪面积对胃癌根治术疗效、术后并发症及患者预后影响的Meta分析
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

1.甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院,甘肃 兰州 730000;2.甘肃省人民医院 普外临床医学中心/甘肃省外科肿瘤分子诊断与精准治疗重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000

作者简介:

马于祺,甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院硕士研究生,主要从事胃肠肿瘤外科方面的研究

基金项目:

国家卫健委胃肠肿瘤诊治重点实验室基金资助项目(NLDTG2022009);甘肃省自然科学基金资助项目(22JR7RA649;2020-ZD-29)。


Meta-analysis of the impact of visceral fat area on the efficacy, postoperative complications, and patients' prognosis of radical gastrectomy
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The First Clinical Medicine College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China;2.General Surgery Clinical Medicine Center/Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 内脏肥胖不仅是多种癌症危险因素,而且与手术疗效及术后并发症的发生密切相关。目前,尽管已有较多关于内脏脂肪面积(VFA)对胃癌根治术疗效、术后并发症及患者术后生存影响的相关研究,但仍缺乏大样本的数据比较分析。因此,本研究通过Meta分析的方法探讨CT在第三腰椎层面(L3-CT)定义的VFA与胃癌根治术疗效、术后并发症及预后的关系。方法 计算机检索多个国内外数据库,收集比较不同VFA(均L3-CT计算)胃癌患者术后情况差异的临床研究,检索时间从建库至2023年7月9日。按照纳入和排除标准筛选文献并提取数据后,使用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入符合标准的文献9篇,6篇为回顾性队列研究,3篇为前瞻性研究,文献累计样本量4 521例。纳入研究NOS评分在7~9分。Meta分析结果显示,高VFA组手术时间较长(MD=19.59,95% CI=0.93~38.25,P=0.04),出血量较大(MD=60.79,95% CI=10.20~111.38,P=0.02),术中淋巴结清扫数量较少(MD=-4.85,95% CI=-6.11~-3.60,P<0.000 01);高VFA组术后住院时间延长(MD=1.75,95% CI=0.99~2.51,P<0.000 01);VFA与总并发症发生率有关(OR=1.57,95% CI=1.32~1.87,P<0.000 01),高VFA组患者更易发生胰瘘(OR=2.58,95% CI=1.41~4.69,P=0.002)和吻合口瘘(OR=1.77,95% CI=1.12~2.79,P=0.01);不同VFA组患者5年生存率差异无统计学意义(OR=1.17,95% CI=0.92~1.49,P=0.21)。结论 高VFA会延长手术时间、造成术中出血增多、减少淋巴结清扫数量,并且高VFA患者更易发生胰瘘和吻合口瘘。由于受研究数量与质量限制,上述结论尚需要更多高质量研究予以验证。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims Visceral obesity is not only a risk factor for various cancers but also closely related to surgical outcomes and the occurrence of postoperative complications. Although there are numerous studies on the impact of visceral fat area (VFA) on the efficacy and postoperative complications of radical gastrectomy as well as postoperative survival of patients, there is still a lack of comparative analysis with large sample sizes. Therefore, this study was performed to explore the relationship between VFA defined by CT at the third lumbar vertebra level (L3-CT) and the efficacy, postoperative complications, and prognosis of radical gastrectomy through a Meta-analysis.Methods A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple domestic and international databases to collect clinical studies comparing the postoperative outcomes of gastric cancer patients with different VFAs (all calculated by L3-CT). The search period was from the inception of the database to July 2023. After literature screening according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction, Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.Results A total of 9 studies meeting the criteria were included, with 6 retrospective cohort studies and 3 prospective studies, comprising a total sample size of 4 521 cases. The NOS scores of the included studies ranged from 7 to 9. Meta-analysis results showed that the high VFA group had longer operative time (MD=19.59, 95% CI=0.93-38.25, P=0.04), greater blood loss (MD=60.79, 95% CI=10.20-111.38, P=0.02), and fewer lymph nodes dissected (MD=-4.85, 95% CI=-6.11--3.60, P<0.000 01). The high VFA group also had prolonged postoperative hospital stay (MD=1.75, 95% CI=0.99-2.51, P<0.000 01). VFA was associated with the overall incidence of complications (OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.32-1.87, P<0.000 01), with the high VFA group more likely to develop pancreatic fistula (OR=2.58, 95% CI=1.41-4.69, P=0.002) and anastomotic leakage (OR=1.77, 95% CI=1.12-2.79, P=0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year survival rate between the different VFA groups (OR=1.17, 95% CI=0.92-1.49, P=0.21).Conclusions High VFA prolongs operative time, with increased intraoperative blood loss, reduced the number of lymph nodes dissected, and makes patients more prone to pancreatic fistula and anastomotic leakage. Due to the limitations in the number and quality of studies, these conclusions require further validation through higher quality studies.

    表 2 两组患者术后并发症的发生情况Table 2 Comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups
    图1 文献筛选流程图Fig.1 The literature screening process
    图2 方法学质量评估 A:风险偏倚图;B:风险偏倚汇总Fig.2 Assessment of the methodological quality A: Risk of bias graph;B: Risk of bias summary
    图3 高低VFA组间术中情况的Meta分析 A:手术时间;B:手术出血量;C:术中淋巴结清扫量Fig.3 Meta-analysis of intraoperative situations between high and low VFA groups A: Operative time; B: Intraoperative blood loss; C: Intraoperative lymph node dissection number
    图4 高低VFA组间术后情况的Meta分析 A:术后住院时间;B:术后排气时间Fig.4 Meta-analysis of postoperative indicators between high and low VFA groups A: Postoperative hospital stay; B:Time to postoperative gas passage
    图5 高低VFA组间并发症发生情况的Meta分析 A:术后总并发症;B:术后严重并发症Fig.5 Meta-analysis of complications between high and low VFA groups A: Overall postoperative complications; B: Serious postoperative complications
    图6 高低VFA组间5年生存率的Meta分析Fig.6 Meta-analysis of 5-year survival rates between high and low VFA groups
    表 1 纳入文献的基本特征Table 1 The baseline characteristics of the included studies
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马于祺,毕心然,张文涛,龚世怡,万浩浩,马亮,范万琦,邓渊,狐鸣,马云涛.内脏脂肪面积对胃癌根治术疗效、术后并发症及患者预后影响的Meta分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2024,33(7):1142-1152.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2024.07.013

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-08
  • 最后修改日期:2024-02-20
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-08-10