不同解剖部位肝内胆管癌患者淋巴结清扫范围与预后关系
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

1.中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院 肝胆外科,江苏 无锡 214044;2.安徽医科大学无锡临床学院,江苏 无锡 214044

作者简介:

谢伟选,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院主治医师,主要从事普通外科肝胆方面的研究。

基金项目:

安徽医科大学校科研基金项目青年科学基金资助项目(2021xkj120)。


Impact of lymph node dissection extent on survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at different anatomical sites
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 904th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214044, China;2.Wuxi Clinical School, Anhui Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214044, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    背景与目的 肝内胆管癌(ICC)发病率逐年升高,因起病隐匿、早期诊断率低,根治性切除仍是唯一可能治愈的手段。淋巴结转移是ICC预后不良的重要危险因素,但目前关于淋巴结清扫范围及其治疗价值仍存争议。有研究提示淋巴结清扫对中央型ICC的获益可能大于周围型ICC。临床主要依赖影像学评估淋巴结状态,但准确率有限。本研究旨在探讨淋巴结清扫对不同解剖部位ICC患者预后的影响,为手术策略选择提供依据。方法 回顾性分析2016年5月—2021年5月在中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇四医院行根治性切除的220例ICC患者的临床资料,其中男性126例、女性94例,平均年龄(56.76±13.15)岁。根据肿瘤解剖部位分为周围型(144例)和中央型(76例)。比较两组在临床特征、白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分分级、术前淋巴结转移风险、淋巴结清扫数目、淋巴结转移情况及术后生存差异,并进一步分析淋巴结清扫数目在不同风险分层患者中的预后价值。结果 周围型与中央型ICC患者在ALBI评分分级(χ2=9.952,P=0.002)、术前淋巴结转移风险(χ2=6.166,P=0.014)、清扫淋巴结数目(χ2=4.167,P=0.042)及淋巴结转移率(χ2=7.331,P=0.007)方面差异均有统计学意义。周围型ICC患者3年总生存率明显高于中央型ICC患者(31.94% vs. 15.79%,χ2=13.890,P<0.001)。在中央型ICC患者中,清扫淋巴结≥6枚者3年总生存率优于<6枚者(16.89% vs. 13.04%,χ2=3.894,P=0.048);尤其在术前淋巴结转移评估高风险的中央型患者中,清扫≥6枚组3年生存率(15.62%)亦优于<6枚组(11.11%)(χ2=3.962,P=0.047)。而在周围型ICC患者及术前低风险人群中,清扫数目与预后差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 周围型ICC预后优于中央型ICC。对于术前淋巴结转移高风险的中央型ICC,行充分淋巴结清扫(≥6枚)可改善患者预后,并有助于提高病理分期准确性,提示应重视术前风险评估以优化手术策略。

    Abstract:

    Background and Aims The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has been increasing in recent years. Due to its insidious onset and low rate of early diagnosis, radical resection remains the only potential curative treatment. Lymph node metastasis is a major adverse prognostic factor in ICC, but the scope and therapeutic value of lymphadenectomy remain controversial. Previous studies suggest that patients with central ICC may derive greater survival benefit from lymphadenectomy than those with peripheral ICC. Preoperative assessment of lymph node status mainly relies on imaging, but its accuracy is limited. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in ICC patients at different anatomical sites to inform surgical decision-making.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 220 ICC patients who underwent radical resection at the 904th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force of the PLA from May 2016 to May 2021. The cohort included 126 males and 94 females, with a mean age of (56.76±13.15) years. Patients were categorized into peripheral ICC (n=144) and central ICC (n=76) groups. Clinical characteristics, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, preoperative risk of lymph node metastasis, number of lymph nodes dissected, lymph node metastasis status, and postoperative survival outcomes were compared. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the prognostic value of the number of lymph nodes dissected under different risk stratifications.Results Significant differences were observed between peripheral and central ICC in ALBI grade (χ2=9.952, P=0.002), preoperative lymph node metastasis risk (χ2=6.166, P=0.014), number of lymph nodes dissected (χ2=4.167, P=0.042), and lymph node metastasis rate (χ2=7.331, P=0.007). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was higher in peripheral ICC (31.94%) than in central ICC (15.79%) (χ2=13.890, P<0.001). Among central ICC patients, those with ≥6 lymph nodes dissected had better 3-year OS than those with <6 (16.89% vs. 13.04%, χ2=3.894, P=0.048). In the high-risk subgroup of central ICC, ≥6 lymph nodes dissected was also associated with improved 3-year OS compared with <6 (15.62% vs. 11.11%, χ2=3.962, P=0.047). In contrast, the number of lymph node dissections had no significant prognostic impact in peripheral ICC or in patients classified as low risk.Conclusion Patients with peripheral ICC had a better prognosis than those with central ICC. Adequate lymphadenectomy (≥6 nodes) improved survival and enhanced staging accuracy in central ICC patients at high risk of lymph node metastasis, highlighting the importance of preoperative risk assessment for optimizing surgical strategies.

    图1 144例周围型ICC患者和76例中央型ICC患者的生存曲线Fig.1 Survival curves of 144 patients with peripheral ICC and 76 patients with central ICC
    图2 不同淋巴结清扫数目ICC患者的生存曲线 A:周围型ICC;B:中央型ICCFig.2 Survival curves of ICC patients stratified by the number of lymph nodes dissected A: Peripheral ICC; B: Central ICC
    图3 不同淋巴结清扫数目的周围型ICC患者的生存曲线 A:术前淋巴结转移评估高风险;B:术前淋巴结转移评估低风险Fig.3 Survival curves of peripheral ICC patients stratified by the number of lymph nodes dissected A: High preoperative risk of lymph node metastasis; B: Low preoperative risk of lymph node metastasis
    图4 不同淋巴结清扫数目的中央型ICC患者的生存曲线 A:术前淋巴结转移评估高风险;B:术前淋巴结转移评估低风险Fig.4 Survival curves of central ICC patients stratified by the number of lymph nodes dissected A: High preoperative risk of lymph node metastasis; B: Low preoperative risk of lymph node metastasis
    表 1 144例周围型ICC和76例中央型ICC患者临床特征比较[n(%)]Table 1 Comparison of clinical characteristics between 144 patients with peripheral ICC and 76 patients with central ICC[n(%)]
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

谢伟选,柏杨,许怀生,濮毅峰,王林,方征,朱庆洲,罗昆仑.不同解剖部位肝内胆管癌患者淋巴结清扫范围与预后关系[J].中国普通外科杂志,2025,34(8):1680-1687.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.240193

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-10
  • 最后修改日期:2025-08-01
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-10-11