CSCO与NCCN最新胃癌诊疗指南浅读与比较
作者:
通讯作者:
作者单位:

中南大学湘雅医院 胃肠外科,湖南 长沙 410008

作者简介:

宋堃,中南大学湘雅医院主治医师,主要从事胃肠道恶性肿瘤方面的研究。

基金项目:

湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2022JJ80117)。


The latest clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer from CSCO and NCCN: a brief review and comparison
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha410008, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    胃癌作为全球常见的恶性肿瘤,尤其在东亚地区(包括中国、日本和韩国),具有较高的发病率和病死率。在我国,胃癌在所有癌症中病死率位列第3位,严重威胁着民众的健康。中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)和美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)发布的胃癌诊疗指南是指导临床胃癌诊疗工作的重要工具,涵盖诊断、手术、围术期治疗、术后随访等相关内容,每年依托最新的临床数据进行更新,给予相应的循证推荐,指导诊治并提供标准化治疗建议,以期帮助医生在复杂病例中做出更优的决策。两部指南在晚期胃癌治疗药物推荐、重视分子标志物检测和推荐晚期胃癌应用免疫治疗等方面意见保持一致,但在围术期治疗策略、术前新辅助治疗或新辅助治疗方案、术后辅助治疗、手术淋巴结清扫范围以及消化道重建等方面的推荐意见存在差异。CSCO指南更侧重于根据中国国情制定综合治疗策略,并提供了更详细的注释部分,更新了一些新的抗体药物;而NCCN指南则更多依赖国际数据,治疗推荐更为统一,并提供了更多的治疗药物选择和更细致的营养监测管理。总体而言,两部指南在推动胃癌治疗标准化和个性化方面发挥了重要作用,为临床工作者提供了宝贵的治疗指导。胃癌早期诊断和筛查的挑战、治疗耐药性问题是指南中需要持续关注的方面,未来对于胃癌的研究也将继续关注免疫治疗和靶向治疗的发展,以提高患者的生存率和生活质量。通过对两部指南的比较学习,医疗工作者可以为胃癌患者提供更规范、个性化的优化治疗方案,积极开展相关临床试验,探索新的药物和治疗方法,以期提高治疗效果与患者生存率。

    Abstract:

    Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumor globally, particularly in East Asia (including China, Japan, and South Korea), where it exhibits high incidence and mortality rates. In China, gastric cancer ranks third among all cancers in terms of mortality, posing a severe threat to public health. The gastric cancer diagnosis and treatment guidelines published by the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) are essential tools guiding clinical practice. These guidelines encompass various aspects, including diagnosis, surgery, perioperative treatment, and postoperative follow-up, and are updated annually based on the latest clinical data. They provide evidence-based recommendations to guide diagnosis and treatment, offering standardized therapeutic advice to help physicians make better decisions in complex cases. Both guidelines share consistent views on the recommendation of treatment drugs for advanced gastric cancer, the importance of molecular biomarker testing, and the application of immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. However, they differ in recommendations regarding perioperative treatment strategies, neoadjuvant treatment or regimens, postoperative adjuvant therapy, the extent of lymph node dissection during surgery, and gastrointestinal reconstruction. The CSCO guidelines emphasize comprehensive treatment strategies tailored to China's specific conditions, include more detailed annotations, and have updated some novel antibody drugs. In contrast, the NCCN guidelines rely more on international data, offer more unified treatment recommendations, and provide a wider range of therapeutic drug options along with more detailed nutritional monitoring and management. Overall, both guidelines play significant roles in promoting the standardization and personalization of gastric cancer treatment, offering valuable guidance for clinicians. Early diagnosis and resistance-related issues highlighted in the guidelines still require further solutions. Future research on gastric cancer will continue to focus on advancing immunotherapy and targeted therapy to improve patients' survival rates and quality of life. By comparing the two guidelines, medical practitioners can provide more standardized and personalized optimal treatment plans for gastric cancer patients. They are encouraged to actively engage in relevant clinical trials to explore new drugs and treatment methods, so as to enhance treatment efficacy and patient survival rates.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

宋堃,林书萌,刘合利. CSCO与NCCN最新胃癌诊疗指南浅读与比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2024,33(12):1950-1957.
DOI:10.7659/j. issn.1005-6947.2024.12.002

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-30
  • 最后修改日期:2024-11-27
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-01-14